Judge Rules Jeweler’s Lawsuit Against PNC Bank Can Move Forward
Joyce’s Jewelry sued the bank after cybercriminals drained its accounts of nearly $1.6 million through a series of wire transfers.

The owners of Joyce’s Jewelry in the Pittsburgh-area city of Uniontown sued PNC in September 2022 after cybercriminals stole nearly $1.6 million from the retailer’s bank accounts through a series of wire transfers.
The theft took place on the afternoon of May 12, 2022, when one of the jewelry store’s employees accidentally logged into a phony website made to look like PNC Bank’s website.
Using the employee’s login credentials obtained from the phishing website, cybercriminals emptied all four of the store’s bank accounts through 11 wire transfers sent over a period of 20 hours.
In the lawsuit, the store’s owners alleged that PNC Bank failed to keep its money safe, while PNC claimed it took the proper steps in regard to the transactions and the fault lies with Joyce’s Jewelry and its employee.
The jeweler claimed these transfers should have raised a red flag for PNC because the money was moved to accounts and businesses it had never sent money to before.
The wire amounts also were far above the usual transaction amounts, by tens of thousands of dollars per wire. Joyce’s had never wired close to $1 million in a single day.
The wires also exceeded the funds available, leading to an overdraft charge of nearly $200,000, another abnormality that should have caught the bank’s attention. Joyce’s, to its knowledge, had never overdrawn on its accounts before, the lawsuit states.
PNC did recover some of the stolen funds, and charged the jeweler for its recovery efforts, bringing the loss total down to $1.1 million.
The case brought by Joyce’s Jewelry initially went to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County, Pennsylvania, which is a state court.
PNC Bank asked that a federal court, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, take up the matter.
On Jan. 12, 2023, the federal court denied that request, ruling the state court should continue to handle the case.
Two weeks later, PNC filed a motion to dismiss, arguing against Joyce’s claims of negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, as well as the jeweler’s request for attorneys’ fees and punitive damages.
The bank also argued it could only be sued only under the state’s Uniform Commercial Code, which guides commercial business transactions, including wire transfers.
Earlier this year, the state court’s decision came back in favor of Joyce’s Jewelry.
In a March 11 ruling, Judge Nancy D. Vernon said the court could not dismiss claims that PNC and individual bank employees acted negligently.
She also said the jeweler can continue to seek attorneys’ fees and punitive damages in the case.
In her ruling, the judge also noted that PNC’s duty to the jeweler goes beyond its contractual obligations and said the bank may still be liable for a tort, meaning an injury or wrong independent of an implied contract.
A spokesperson from PNC said, “PNC regrets that Joyce’s Jewelry was the victim of a crime and suffered financial losses. However, Joyce’s Jewelry could have avoided being defrauded had they taken the reasonable precautions recommended by PNC at any stage of this process.
“Although the court denied PNC’s requested relief at this stage, PNC expects the facts and law will ultimately establish that PNC is not liable for Joyce’s Jewelry’s losses.”
Howard Kaplan, partner at the law firm Kaplan & Grady and Joyce’s Jewelry’s counsel, shared some insight into the case and what it could mean for other small businesses in this situation.
The recent ruling is significant, he said, because that’s not usually how these cases play out.
“Usually, [these cases] are under a very narrow legal theory and individual bank employees are not put in the mixer. And punitive damages aren’t a question, nor is tort liability for negligence,” he said.
“Usually, disputes with bank customers are a creature of contract, as opposed to tort or negligence. So, the liability on a negligence theory is broader. The potential damages and liability are broader than on a contract theory,” said Kaplan.
If the bank was able to confine the lawsuit to the Uniform Commercial Code claim, it likely would have limited the damages it may have to pay.
The judge’s March 11 ruling is “a really bad development for [PNC] because they don’t want their employees getting sued, and they don’t want to be exposed to open-ended damages,” he said.
The damages are, in part, for “gaslighting” the jeweler into believing the fault was solely theirs, and for sending the business into collections and risking its livelihood, Kaplan said.
As for how much, that’s a question for the judge and jury.
“What is it going to take to send a message to PNC that the way that they’ve treated their customer in this instance was unacceptable? And I would think that it would take a large number to send a message to them, likely a multiple of Joyce’s loss,” he said.
“The bank here is spending more on their defense than it would cost to pay Joyce’s back. They will spend more than a million dollars through trial to avoid doing right by their customer.”
Beyond the legal implications of the case, Kaplan said he wants people to understand the reality and relatability of the situation.
“They’re going to blame a 70-year-old woman for making a mistake on her computer and say what resulted—collection of all of Joyce’s cash into one account and then shipping that money out in 11 highly suspect wires over the course of 20 hours—is all fair and OK,” he said. “It’s really offensive from a common-sense perspective.”
“We didn’t say that Joyce’s did everything right. But PNC is required to have reasonable security and is required to follow those reasonable security measures in a reasonable way,” Kaplan said.
“And the facts of the case seem to show that one or the other isn’t true. Either you didn’t have the proper security in place, or you all were asleep at the switch, but it has to be one or the other because of what happened,” he said.
The case is in the preliminary stages, but Kaplan’s hope is that others in this situation can take the same approach.
“If we actually win the case, and I am confident that we will, then that roadmap will just be that much more useful and hopefully it will lead more broadly to better recoveries for defrauded customers, and there are many more out there,” said Kaplan.
The Latest

The “Les Pétales” collection imagines roses caught mid-bloom as a tribute to nature’s beauty.

Luxury brands charge thousands for their shoes and handbags. Jewelers pricing diamond products should take note, Peter Smith writes.

Rotenberg was an active member of the American Gem Society and an accomplished appraiser who also worked with therapy dogs at a hospital.

The Seymour & Evelyn Holtzman Bench Scholarship from Jewelers of America returns for a second year.

In its inaugural year, the SMO Foundation will focus on supporting two organizations in West Africa and one in South America.


The announcement comes just as the 90-day freeze on the “reciprocal” tariffs nears its end, giving countries more time to negotiate.

Kellie, who joined the organization in 2019, will remain in his role through the end of 2025.

The countdown is on for the JCK Las Vegas Show and JA is pulling out all the stops.

Police officers apprehended the suspects as they were allegedly attempting to gain entry into another jewelry store.

The program, a collaboration between Julius Klein Diamonds and the Women’s Jewelry Association, is in its second year.

Sponsored by the Gemological Institute of America

The 2025 Australian Open champion is the jewelry brand’s first athlete ambassador.

The West Village jewelry boutique’s new shop-in-shop is the cornerstone of Nordstrom’s revamped jewelry hall.

This past year, the manufacturer said it recorded below-zero emissions per carat of natural diamond.

The brand’s “Golden Strada” statement necklace features round, marquise, and pear diamonds that sparkle like Fourth of July fireworks.

JSA’s Scott Guginsky provided a list of nine security measures jewelers should observe while locking up for the long weekend.

Located on Rodeo Drive, the store’s design was inspired by Hollywood and Los Angeles culture.

The new location continues the brand’s celebration of its 25th anniversary.

The online watch marketplace’s “Time Is Our Thing” campaign highlights the importance of time.

She will oversee strategic planning, fundraising, industry partnerships, and the launch of the Gem Legacy Campus in Tanzania.

Working with Amazon’s Counterfeit Crimes Unit and law enforcement, Pandora helped to shut down a large-scale counterfeit network in China.

The jewelry company has closed its three California brick-and-mortar stores, as well as its online shop, for now.

The company is providing the opportunity for an FIT student to work alongside master diamond cutter Willie Lopez in its workshop.

He is remembered for his successful entrepreneurship, generosity, and dedication to his family.

The jewelry store chain has reportedly been struggling with costs related to tariffs as well as tough retail competition.

Welcome warm summer days with red hot rubies perfectly chosen as July’s birthstone.

Co-founders Afzal Imram and Lin Ruiyin brought their son’s story of a cosmic egg, toadstool, and railroad to life in their new collection.