ColumnistsMar 12, 2024
The PR Adviser: Closing Sales and Following UpColumnistsMay 15, 2024
Squirrel Spotting: Why Retailers Struggle to Fire Brands
Why do so many jewelers keep lines that are not selling? Peter Smith thinks the answer lies in these two behavioral principles.
Peter Smith is an industry consultant, speaker, sales trainer, and author. He can be reached via email at TheRetailSmiths@gmail.com.
Brands have been in the news of late, with Watches of Switzerland’s acquisition of the U.S. arm of Roberto Coin, and Richemont buying Italian jewelry brand Vhernier.
This follows earlier news that De Beers Group will dissolve Forevermark in the United States and other markets and relaunch it as a diamond jewelry brand in India.
And, of course, we had last year’s announcement that Rolex is acquiring Bucherer.
These developments got me thinking about a related question, and that is, why do retailers struggle to fire brands when they no longer perform for them?
You might think such decisions would always be as simple, as the numbers are either working or they’re not.
If the sales and profitability are good for business, you keep the brand. If the metrics don’t work, you fire the brand.
How complicated is that? As it turns out, it’s pretty complicated.
In the face of declining sales, reduced margins, and unhealthy inventories, retailers continue to forge ahead with brands that once were important to them but have long since ceased to enjoy favored-partner status.
They don’t like the brand enough to cheerlead for it internally or externally but still remain indifferent enough to continue to defer on separation decisions.
Psychologists have several explanations for why this happens, but the two that stand out for me are the status quo bias, and the sunk-cost fallacy.
In the first instance, the status quo bias, we know we should make a change, but the headaches associated with doing so far outweigh the benefits of pulling the plug.
In “A New Way To Think: Your Guide to Superior Management Effectiveness,” Roger Martin wrote, “In short, research into the workings of the human brain suggests that the mind loves automaticity more than just about anything else—certainly more than engaging in conscious consideration. Given a choice, it would like to do the same thing again and again.”
There is a tendency to rationalize the status quo bias as being related to habitual loyalty; we do it because we’ve always done it, it’s easy. The reality, of course, is that it is more aptly related to inertia.
We don’t want to change because doing so means a ton of work, and we’re not looking to take on more work.
Related stories will be right here …
This follows earlier news that De Beers Group will dissolve Forevermark in the United States and other markets and relaunch it as a diamond jewelry brand in India.
And, of course, we had last year’s announcement that Rolex is acquiring Bucherer.
These developments got me thinking about a related question, and that is, why do retailers struggle to fire brands when they no longer perform for them?
You might think such decisions would always be as simple, as the numbers are either working or they’re not.
If the sales and profitability are good for business, you keep the brand. If the metrics don’t work, you fire the brand.
How complicated is that? As it turns out, it’s pretty complicated.
In the face of declining sales, reduced margins, and unhealthy inventories, retailers continue to forge ahead with brands that once were important to them but have long since ceased to enjoy favored-partner status.
They don’t like the brand enough to cheerlead for it internally or externally but still remain indifferent enough to continue to defer on separation decisions.
Psychologists have several explanations for why this happens, but the two that stand out for me are the status quo bias, and the sunk-cost fallacy.
In the first instance, the status quo bias, we know we should make a change, but the headaches associated with doing so far outweigh the benefits of pulling the plug.
In “A New Way To Think: Your Guide to Superior Management Effectiveness,” Roger Martin wrote, “In short, research into the workings of the human brain suggests that the mind loves automaticity more than just about anything else—certainly more than engaging in conscious consideration. Given a choice, it would like to do the same thing again and again.”
There is a tendency to rationalize the status quo bias as being related to habitual loyalty; we do it because we’ve always done it, it’s easy. The reality, of course, is that it is more aptly related to inertia.
We don’t want to change because doing so means a ton of work, and we’re not looking to take on more work.
As for the principle of sunk-cost fallacy, that’s a very real thing and a powerful impediment to change.
We justify the years we’ve spent, the money we’ve invested in inventory, training, marketing, and even shop-in-shops.
We worry our team will struggle with change, when, in fact, they’re often well ahead of the principles of the business, as they’ve lived it on the front lines and have seen the decline in interest and/or effectiveness of the brand.
We also worry that customers we’ve sold a given brand to over the years will regret having purchased the brand from you if you choose to discard the line. Will they feel betrayed and take their business elsewhere?
Every restaurant that ever closed its doors has disappointed some diners. Every store that has ever closed had some fans. And every brand that was important at one time has customers who are collectors and repeat buyers.
The problem is, in all cases, there just weren’t enough of them. Things change and people move on. They are rarely as distraught as your worst fears may conjure.
In fact, one of the paradoxes of consumer behavior is that while it is commonly accepted that shoppers love automaticity, and automaticity often comes from brand consistency, we are also apt to seek out change.
In “Using Behavioral Science in Marketing: Drive Customer Action and Loyalty by Prompting Instinctive Responses,” Nancy Harhut wrote, “People are hardwired to notice things that are different from what surrounds them.”
It’s one of the reasons many retailers love to go to trade shows, to experience what’s new, and it is one of the reasons I believe quality physical retail stores will always be relevant.
Customers love the sense of excitement and discovery often delivered in the best retail environments.
As for those brands you need to address, my advice is, if you can’t bring yourself to completely sever ties, recalibrate your investment to align with the brand’s relevance to your business today, not what it used to be.
That means adjusting your inventory, your case space, and your training and marketing spend.
Block out the noise, including the noise inside your head, and do what’s right for your business.
Happy retailing!
More on Columnists
The Latest
Events & AwardsOct 17, 2025
An Edit of Italian Jewels Is Coming to NYCThe new showcase dedicated to Italian jewelry design is set for Oct. 29-30.
TrendsOct 17, 2025
Piece of the Week: Judi Powers Jewelry’s ‘Stella’ EarringsTake a gaze at the sky with this pair of platinum diamond-set star earrings with blue lace agate drops.
IndependentsOct 17, 2025
From the Jazz Age to the Information Age: London Jewelers Turns 100In 2026, the jewelry retailer will celebrate a milestone only a small percentage of family-owned businesses survive to see.
Brought to you by
Protect Your Customers and Your BusinessYou deserve to know what you are selling–to protect your customers as well as your business and your reputation.
IndependentsOct 16, 2025
Retailer Hall of Fame 2025: Jeffrey Zimmer Jeffrey Zimmer's decades of leadership at Reeds Jewelers are defined by integrity, a love of sourcing gemstones, and a heart for community.
Weekly QuizOct 16, 2025
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
AuctionsOct 16, 2025
Sotheby’s Introduces Custom Jewelry ServiceThe new high jewelry design and production process takes 30 days or less from concept to completion, the auction house said.
MajorsOct 16, 2025
Oscar Heyman’s Holiday Catalog Is Out, and It’s SpectacularThe holiday catalog for 2025 features never-before-seen images of more than 100 one-of-a-kind masterpieces.
Brought to you by
JA New York Fall Is Right Around the CornerThe upcoming show provides savvy retailers with the opportunity to stock their cases with best sellers in advance of the holiday season.
CollectionsOct 16, 2025
Foundrae Adds To ‘United in Love’ CollectionThe brand has released a second installment of its collection of traditional and non-traditional commitment heirlooms.
IndependentsOct 15, 2025
Retailer Hall of Fame 2025: Kathy CoreyCorey rescued New England chain Day’s Jewelers, preserving its legacy with strong people skills, pragmatism, and a “get-it-done” attitude.
CrimeOct 15, 2025
Men Receive Lengthy Prison Sentences for 2023 Murder of Colorado JewelerCharles Robinson Shay was sentenced to life in prison plus 120 years while his accomplice, Michael James McCormack, got 75 years.
Events & AwardsOct 15, 2025
‘Douriean Fletcher: Jewelry of the Afrofuture’ Opens at MADThe Museum of Arts and Design's new exhibition features 75 pieces by the designer, best known for her work in the “Black Panther” films.
Events & AwardsOct 15, 2025
JCK, Luxury to Debut New Watch Section in Vegas Next YearTimepieces at Luxury will take place at The Venetian and, like Luxury, will be invitation-only for the first two days.
AuctionsOct 15, 2025
Christie's Announces New Jewelry Department LeadershipThe auction house named a new global head of jewelry, as well as a new head of the jewelry department for the Americas.
IndependentsOct 14, 2025
Retailer Hall of Fame 2025: Tom DixonAs chairman of Schwanke-Kasten Jewelers, Tom Dixon has been tasked with honoring the past and shaping the future of the family-run store.
Events & AwardsOct 14, 2025
Here Are the Winners of the BIJC, JA ‘Emerging Jewelers’ Grant Katty Villapando Lyte and Mica Rencher received a $10,000 grant for their business, Shimmer Culture LLC.
IndependentsOct 14, 2025
Day’s Jewelers Crafts Custom Jewelry for No.1 NBA Draft Pick Cooper FlaggThe parents of the Dallas Mavericks rookie bought their engagement ring at a Day’s store in Bangor, Maine, in 1997.
SourcingOct 14, 2025
Pragnell Debuts Kitulo Garnet Jewelry The UK-based brand sourced the gemstones, which are fully traceable, from an artisanal mining community in Tanzania.
CollectionsOct 10, 2025
Count Down to the Holidays With Astrid & Miyu’s Advent CalendarsThe trio of Advent calendars include a version with 18-karat gold and lab-grown diamond jewelry in a red lacquer jewelry box.
CollectionsOct 10, 2025
Piece of the Week: Marla Aaron’s ‘Nymphenburg Lock’Created in collaboration with Nymphenburg Porcelain, the lock is part of a four-piece collection that took two years to bring to fruition.
MajorsOct 10, 2025
Frederick Goldman Names New VP of SalesJewelry industry veteran Alisa Bunger has taken on the role.
SourcingOct 09, 2025
Feriel Zerouki Is Leaving De Beers The company and industry leader’s two-decade tenure with De Beers will come to a close at the end of the month.
AuctionsOct 09, 2025
This Fabergé Egg Could Crack $27M At Auction“The Winter Egg” set the world auction record for a Fabergé piece twice at previous Christie’s sales.
MajorsOct 09, 2025
Sy Kessler Buying Watch Batteries as Silver Hits Record High The company will pay 1.5x silver’s current spot price for each pound of silver oxide batteries submitted.
CollectionsOct 09, 2025
Katkim Launches First Men’s CollectionThe line includes a “Shadow” series crafted exclusively for the new men’s offering and reimagined styles from the brand’s core collections.
SourcingOct 09, 2025
Gemfields’ Mini Mixed-Quality Ruby Auction Garners $11MThe rough on offer was recovered from a newer area at the Montepuez mine.
SourcingOct 08, 2025
In ‘Storied Diamond,’ Jared Jewelers Is Emphasizing the Journey The retailer’s new collection of engagement rings and fashion jewelry is set with natural diamonds that are traceable via blockchain.
