CrimeApr 28, 2025
Customs Seizes Nearly 2,000 Pieces of Counterfeit Van Cleef & Arpels JewelryU.S. customs agents in El Paso, Texas, intercepted the package, which would have been worth $9 million if the jewelry was genuine.
EditorsOct 31, 2014
The latest diamond industry row
I am not proud to admit it now, but I was the kind of little girl who wanted to quit games in the middle if it looked like I wasn’t going to win, a trait for which my mom, like any good mother should, always admonished me.
I remember at one point we got a Garfield novelty glass from McDonald’s that pictured the cartoon cat furiously paddling at the front of the canoe in one direction while the dog Odie paddled with just as much vigor at the other end but in the opposite direction. Above Garfield a thought bubble hovered that read, “I’m easy to get along with when things go my way,” but, in the end, the two weren’t getting anywhere. This, my mom declared, was the perfect glass to describe me.
Fast-forward a couple of decades, and I am adult, confronted with a group of adults who refuse to participate in an important event because things aren’t going their way, the latest in a continuing series of slights and fights that aren’t getting the diamond industry anywhere, just like the cat and the dog in that canoe.
As I am sure you have heard by now, a group of eight industry organizations announced this week that they wouldn’t be attending the World Diamond Council’s annual meeting, which took place this week in Antwerp.
By way of explanation, the World Federation of Diamond Bourses circulated this news release that was scant on details about why exactly the eight groups were skipping the meeting. So I reached out to a number of the groups, asking them for more details and interviews with their respective heads.
I asked: What was it that prompted you to boycott the meeting? What is the leadership of the WDC, which just named Pat Syvrud as the first executive director in its history, doing that you disagree with specifically?
What I got in return to my questions at first was a lot of runaround--people were traveling (though apparently not to Antwerp), I needed to ask this person instead of this person, why don’t you ask this organization why they said that, etc.
The only organization initially to give me any kind of answer was the WFDB itself, which said in response to my inquiry that “the following issues are being clarified.”
Among the clarifications was this: “The industry Bodies await in anticipation the outcome of the WDC AGM [annual general meeting] and the future direction the organization is
planning for itself. Once the AGM report has been studied, a formal press release will be issued by the industry bodies regarding its future relationship with the WDC.”
On Friday morning, however, I came in to a more explanatory email, relatively speaking, from India’s Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council and the Bharat Diamond Bourse, two of the eight organizations that boycotted the WDC meeting.
The GJEPC and BDB said suggestions to broaden the “scope and focus” of the WDC’s activity beyond conflict diamonds led to the organizations’ decision to skip the meeting. They also apparently are perturbed because the WDC sent out a survey to its members in which “questions were asked that exceeded the mandate of the WDC” and did not send it out to the industry at large, meaning these organizations didn’t get to weigh in.
While WDC sources told my fellow trade journalist Rob Bates--who noted in this excellent blog posted Wednesday that this latest boycott is yet another embarrassment to the industry--that it isn’t true that the WDC is looking to expand its activities beyond conflict diamonds, I am sure the eight organizations that boycotted the meeting have their reasons for believing it to be.
My question, however, is this: why the boycott? Was that really necessary? If you have concerns about the direction the organization is taking, doesn’t it seem more effective to go to the meeting and express them, rather than skip it and circulate a vague news release that does nothing but engender resentment and negativity?
The GJEPC said in its email to me that it is “expected that open and interactive discussions will resolve the issue in near future.”
Couldn’t that have taken place at the meeting that just happened this week so the industry can move on and address other issues?
I just don’t agree with the decision by these “important sections of the industry” to boycott a meeting of an organization that’s so important. It’s no more acceptable than it was for me to quit mid-game as a child because things weren’t going the way I wanted.
On Friday morning, however, I came in to a more explanatory email, relatively speaking, from India’s Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council and the Bharat Diamond Bourse, two of the eight organizations that boycotted the WDC meeting.
The GJEPC and BDB said suggestions to broaden the “scope and focus” of the WDC’s activity beyond conflict diamonds led to the organizations’ decision to skip the meeting. They also apparently are perturbed because the WDC sent out a survey to its members in which “questions were asked that exceeded the mandate of the WDC” and did not send it out to the industry at large, meaning these organizations didn’t get to weigh in.
While WDC sources told my fellow trade journalist Rob Bates--who noted in this excellent blog posted Wednesday that this latest boycott is yet another embarrassment to the industry--that it isn’t true that the WDC is looking to expand its activities beyond conflict diamonds, I am sure the eight organizations that boycotted the meeting have their reasons for believing it to be.
My question, however, is this: why the boycott? Was that really necessary? If you have concerns about the direction the organization is taking, doesn’t it seem more effective to go to the meeting and express them, rather than skip it and circulate a vague news release that does nothing but engender resentment and negativity?
The GJEPC said in its email to me that it is “expected that open and interactive discussions will resolve the issue in near future.”
Couldn’t that have taken place at the meeting that just happened this week so the industry can move on and address other issues?
I just don’t agree with the decision by these “important sections of the industry” to boycott a meeting of an organization that’s so important. It’s no more acceptable than it was for me to quit mid-game as a child because things weren’t going the way I wanted.
More on Editors
The Latest
TrendsApr 28, 2025
Suzanne Kalan Launches Tech Ring Jacket CollectionHealth monitors become statement pieces when paired with the brand’s new collection of stackable diamond-studded bands.
Events & AwardsApr 28, 2025
JCK Industry Fund Announces 2025 Grant RecipientsTen organizations were selected this year.
Brought to you by
Watch: The Winston Red: GIA Examines the Smithsonian’s Newest AdditionSupplier Spotlight Sponsored by GIA
IndependentsApr 28, 2025
John Atencio Appoints 2 to Wholesale TeamKim Carpenter and Sam Gevisenheit have joined the brand.
Weekly QuizApr 24, 2025
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
CollectionsApr 25, 2025
Sylvie Looks to Water in New Sculptural Bridal Collection“Shell Auranova” is the next generation of the brand’s bridal line, featuring half-bezel engagement rings with bold and fluid designs.
FinancialsApr 25, 2025
Kering’s Jewelry Brands Persevere as Q1 Sales Sink 14%Boucheron and Pomellato performed well in an otherwise bleak quarter for Kering amid struggles at Gucci.
Brought to you by
Emerging Jewelers Accelerator Program Announces Second Cohort of Aspiring Jewelry Entrepreneurs Six new retail businesses were selected for the 2025 program, which began in January.
SourcingApr 25, 2025
De Beers Sales, Production Fall in Q1 Amid UncertaintyThe company said it expects sightholders to remain “cautious” with their purchasing due to all the unknowns around the U.S. tariffs.
Supplier BulletinApr 24, 2025
Protect Your Customers and Your BusinessSponsored by the Gemological Institute of America
IndependentsApr 24, 2025
Longtime Iowa Jeweler Herman Ginsberg Dies at 99 A third-generation jeweler, Ginsberg worked at his family’s store, Ginsberg Jewelers, from 1948 until his retirement in 2019.
FinancialsApr 24, 2025
Charles & Colvard Delisted From Nasdaq Due to NoncomplianceThe company failed to file its quarterly reports in a timely manner.
SourcingApr 24, 2025
Young Diamantaires Transition to NonprofitThe organization also announced its board of directors.
TrendsApr 24, 2025
Amanda’s Style File: So CharmingCharms may be tiny but with their small size comes endless layering possibilities, from bracelets to necklaces and earrings.
MajorsApr 23, 2025
Bulgari Doubles Size of Jewelry Factory in ItalyLocated in Valenza, the now 355,000-square-foot facility includes a new jewelry school that’s open to the public, Scuola Bulgari.
Events & AwardsApr 23, 2025
PDPaola Creative Director Wins FGI’s ‘Rising Star’ AwardPaola Sasplugas, co-founder of the Barcelona-based jewelry brand, received the Fine Jewelry Award.
AuctionsApr 23, 2025
Rare Custom Rolex Daytona Heads to AuctionA platinum Zenith-powered Daytona commissioned in the late ‘90s will headline Sotheby’s Important Watches sale in Geneva next month.
MajorsApr 23, 2025
David Yurman’s New Campaign Stars Carmelo Anthony, Jaylen BrownThe basketball stars wear men’s jewelry from the “Curb Chain” collection.
MajorsApr 22, 2025
Zales’ Rebrand Takes Playful Approach to Fine JewelryThe Signet Jewelers-owned retailer wants to encourage younger shoppers to wear fine jewelry every day, not just on special occasions.
AuctionsApr 22, 2025
Christie’s to Auction JAR Jewelry CollectionThe 21 pieces, all from a private collector, will be offered at its Magnificent Jewels auction next month.
ColumnistsApr 22, 2025
The PR Adviser: Building Buzz Through Word of MouthLilian Raji answers a question from a reader who is looking to grow her jewelry business but has a limited marketing budget.
GradingApr 22, 2025
Avi Levy Is GCAL By Sarine’s New Chief Growth OfficerGCAL by Sarine created the new role to sharpen the company’s focus on strategic partnerships and scalable expansion.
IndependentsApr 22, 2025
Brinker’s Jewelers Acquires Fellow IndependentThe Indiana jeweler has acquired Scottsdale Fine Jewelers in Scottsdale, Arizona.
Events & AwardsApr 21, 2025
An Exhibition Exploring the History of Cartier Is Now on Display“Cartier: Design, Craft, and Legacy” opened earlier this month at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.
IndependentsApr 21, 2025
New York Jeweler to Close After 111 YearsVan Cott Jewelers in Vestal, New York, is hosting a going-out-of-business sale.
IndependentsApr 21, 2025
IJO Names New Director of Vendor Relations, Merchandise StrategyIndustry veteran Samantha Larson has held leadership roles at Borsheims, McTeigue & McClelland, Stuller, and Long’s Jewelers.
Events & AwardsApr 21, 2025
Jewelers of Louisiana, Mississippi Jewelers Association to Co-Host ConventionThe two organizations will hold the educational event together this fall in Mississippi.
