ColumnistsMay 09, 2023
Creative Connecting: The Dos & Donts of Pre-Trade Show MarketingColumnistsMay 23, 2023
Squirrel Spotting: The Case of the Pricey Repair
When it comes to pricing jewelry repairs, you should start by asking a simple question about the piece at hand, Peter Smith writes.
Peter Smith is an industry consultant, speaker, sales trainer, and author. He can be reached via email at TheRetailSmiths@gmail.com.
After completing my sales “Masterclass” at a store recently, I had the good fortune of spending a few minutes with the gentleman who ran the repair shop for the company.
Ray was curious, conflicted even, about the inexact science of pricing repairs for the store’s customers.
As he explained it, he was constantly balancing competing interests each time he quoted a price for a repair.
There seemed to be a prevailing assumption that the customer always wanted the lowest price that could be offered.
The salespeople, more often than not, adopted the role of passionate advocates for the customer getting nothing less than the lowest price possible.
After all, they reasoned, the customer would surely consider them and the store in a poor light if the repair quote was perceived as too expensive.
On the other hand, and perhaps most poignantly, Ray believed that the customer’s best interests, and the store’s best interests, were better served by quoting a price that allowed the shop to deliver the finest repair possible.
Not the bare minimum, not the obligatory repair, but the absolute best job a craftsman could do.
That inherent conflict is, of course, not exclusive to quoting repairs. It is often true for special orders, for custom work, or for any of the many essentials that pepper our days in a typical retail environment.
In thinking about Ray’s pricing dilemma, it occurred to me that there are both practical and psychological factors at play.
We assume customers have a clear sense of what they should pay for repairs when, in fact, the opposite is often true. More often than not, a customer has absolutely no idea what a given repair should cost.
I recently engaged with an appliance repair man about what I perceived to be a small matter with my fridge and, when he let me know what was needed, I decided that it was time to invest in a new refrigerator, after 13 years of fine service.
I didn’t go into the conversation with the appliance repair guy with any awareness of what a repair should cost, and I didn’t immediately conclude that I was being “ripped off” when he listed the possible remedies and the costs of said repair.
The fridge conversation was very matter-of-fact. Certain things needed addressing, and if I wanted them done, it was going to cost me a few hundred dollars.
There was no emotional component to the conversation about my fridge, unless you count its devilment of being too accessible whenever I got even a hint of a craving … darn you to hell, fridge!
Ray was curious, conflicted even, about the inexact science of pricing repairs for the store’s customers.
As he explained it, he was constantly balancing competing interests each time he quoted a price for a repair.
There seemed to be a prevailing assumption that the customer always wanted the lowest price that could be offered.
The salespeople, more often than not, adopted the role of passionate advocates for the customer getting nothing less than the lowest price possible.
After all, they reasoned, the customer would surely consider them and the store in a poor light if the repair quote was perceived as too expensive.
On the other hand, and perhaps most poignantly, Ray believed that the customer’s best interests, and the store’s best interests, were better served by quoting a price that allowed the shop to deliver the finest repair possible.
Not the bare minimum, not the obligatory repair, but the absolute best job a craftsman could do.
That inherent conflict is, of course, not exclusive to quoting repairs. It is often true for special orders, for custom work, or for any of the many essentials that pepper our days in a typical retail environment.
In thinking about Ray’s pricing dilemma, it occurred to me that there are both practical and psychological factors at play.
We assume customers have a clear sense of what they should pay for repairs when, in fact, the opposite is often true. More often than not, a customer has absolutely no idea what a given repair should cost.
I recently engaged with an appliance repair man about what I perceived to be a small matter with my fridge and, when he let me know what was needed, I decided that it was time to invest in a new refrigerator, after 13 years of fine service.
I didn’t go into the conversation with the appliance repair guy with any awareness of what a repair should cost, and I didn’t immediately conclude that I was being “ripped off” when he listed the possible remedies and the costs of said repair.
The fridge conversation was very matter-of-fact. Certain things needed addressing, and if I wanted them done, it was going to cost me a few hundred dollars.
There was no emotional component to the conversation about my fridge, unless you count its devilment of being too accessible whenever I got even a hint of a craving … darn you to hell, fridge!
“Understanding what a given repair request really means is not a rationalization for overcharging the customer, but an indicator of the best course of action.” — Peter Smith
When it comes to jewelry repairs, believing the customer always expects the lowest price is to assume they have no emotional involvement with the piece in question.
We assume the exchange of payment for labor and materials is nothing more than pure economics just like my refrigerator, minus the edible goodies inside.
Mercifully that is not how the cookie crumbles, at least not every time.
There obviously are occasions when a customer must decide whether a given piece of jewelry matters enough to them to invest their hard-earned money in fixing it.
The condition of the piece may be such that the price of repair will determine whether they will have it fixed or return to whatever little drawer it was nestled in prior to the store visit.
More often than not, however, the jewelry in question is extremely meaningful to the customer. They have a strong emotional bond with the piece, whether it is an important family heirloom or otherwise.
It may have been something acquired or gifted that is imbued with meaning and symbolism. Its restoration might signal something much more profound than the sum total of labor hours and material costs.
Psychological research has definitively established that we place considerable value on things we already own, far beyond what any rational assessment by others might conclude. That means anything we currently own always will be worth more to us than things we have yet to acquire.
Understanding what a given repair request really means is not a rationalization for overcharging the customer, but an indicator of the best course of action.
If the sales or service person engages the customer and asks the right questions, they will have a better understanding of the customer’s emotional quotient.
Ask a simple question such as, “That’s a lovely ring. What’s its story?”
A discovery question like this will result in one of two outcomes.
The first suggests keeping the work a bare minimum, and the price consistent with a lesser effort and fewer materials. And a second option that demands a much higher level of deliverable at a very different price.
The two prices can be offered to the customer (we all love to have choices and control) with a necessary proviso and a strong recommendation.
“Look, we can do the repair for ‘x’ and it will get back to wearable condition. However, I fear that such a repair is a temporary fix and I worry you may have issues down the road.”
That solution might be just what the doctor ordered for the customer, and the qualifier about future issues will have been delivered as a necessary note of caution.
Depending on your conversation with the customer it might also warrant a very different recommendation, such as: “On the other hand, this is what we should do, and it will likely take care of those problems for years to come.
“It is your decision, but I would strongly recommend the second option as I want you to have the absolute best outcome when you pick your ring up next week. What would you like to do?”
If the customer has minimal emotional investment in the ring, they may choose the least expensive option, the bare minimum to make the ring wearable.
If, however, they have a strong emotional investment in their ring, they will want and expect the absolute best repair and restoration possible.
Do the work of engagement and discovery, stop spending from your own pocket, and remember, the very best value is always a satisfied customer.
Happy selling!
More on Columnists
The Latest
SourcingJun 10, 2025
De Beers Turns to Brown, Yellow Diamonds for New ‘Beacon’“Ombré Desert Diamonds” will emphasize cream-, champagne-, and brown-colored diamonds, shades that set natural stones apart from lab grown.
AuctionsJun 10, 2025
Noonans to Auction 16th-Century Signet RingIt's one of the “Gresham grasshopper” rings English financier Sir Thomas Gresham was known to gift to acquaintances or business associates.
CollectionsJun 10, 2025
Tabayer Names Mary Chiam as CEOThe brand also debuted its new “Zorae” collection featuring a talisman of protection and harmony inspired by a sheaf of wheat.
Brought to you by
Jewelers of America is Headed to Las Vegas for JCK 2025The countdown is on for the JCK Las Vegas Show and JA is pulling out all the stops.
MajorsJun 10, 2025
Lauren Johansen Joins Loudr As Loudr’s new account manager, Johansen will partner with clients to craft and execute marketing strategies.
Weekly QuizJun 05, 2025
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
Events & AwardsJun 09, 2025
And the Winners of the 2025 Couture Design Awards Are … Designers were recognized in 12 categories, from platinum to pearls, before the evening ended with a new, retail-focused award.
AuctionsJun 09, 2025
Nancy Astor’s Cartier Tiara Sells for $1.2MThe rare turquoise and diamond jewel was the top lot at Bonhams’ June jewelry sale.
Brought to you by
The True Power Behind the Counter: Why Sales Associates Are the Heart of the Jewelry BusinessWhen investing in your jewelry business, it's important not to overlook the most crucial element of success: the sales associates.
Events & AwardsJun 09, 2025
Here Are the 2025 Retailer Hall of Fame InducteesThis year’s honorees include a Midwest retailer and two multi-store independents, one in New York and the other in New England.
Events & AwardsJun 09, 2025
CASE Awards Now Accepting Entries For 2025The deadline to submit is June 16.
MajorsJun 09, 2025
RDI Diamonds Partners With LavalierThe diamond wholesaler is working with the insurance provider to seamlessly offer personal jewelry insurance to RDI retailers’ clients.
CollectionsJun 06, 2025
Piece of the Week: Harwell Godfrey’s ‘Granny Squares Eleanor’ Necklace As an homage to iconic crochet blankets, the necklace features the nostalgic motif through a kaleidoscope of cabochon-cut stones.
Events & AwardsJun 05, 2025
The 12 Fresh Faces in Couture’s Design AtelierDiscover the dozen up-and-coming brands exhibiting in the Design Atelier for the first time.
SourcingJun 05, 2025
A Rare Suite of Rubies Has Arrived in Las VegasThe “Royal Ruby” Collection is a quintet of untreated rubies curated by collector Jack Abraham.
Events & AwardsJun 05, 2025
Daymond John to Give Keynote at JCK Las VegasThe entrepreneur and “Shark Tank” star will share his top tips for success.
MajorsJun 05, 2025
Platinum Guild International Updates Leadership TeamTwo existing executives have been given new roles.
Events & AwardsJun 05, 2025
Zillion Announces 'Women in STEM' Scholarship RecipientMeredith Tiderington, an electrical engineering student, was selected for the award.
Lab-GrownJun 04, 2025
GIA Reverting to More General Terminology for Lab-Grown DiamondsIt will quit assigning the stones specific color and clarity grades in favor of applying “new descriptive terminology.”
Events & AwardsJun 04, 2025
As JCK Talks Returns, Don’t Miss These 12 SessionsFrom design trends to sustainability, here’s a roundup of can’t-miss education sessions at JCK Las Vegas.
CrimeJun 04, 2025
10 Safety Tips for the Las Vegas Shows The Jewelers’ Security Alliance offers advice for those attending the annual trade shows.
MajorsJun 04, 2025
Amy Curran Promoted at Hill & Co.Her new role is director of strategic initiatives.
CollectionsJun 03, 2025
In Her Latest Collection, Viviana Langhoff Is Leaning Into GoldThe designer is embracing bold pieces with weight to them in “AU79,” a collection she celebrated with a creative launch party.
FinancialsJun 03, 2025
Signet Jewelers Sees Turnaround in Q1 With Sales Ticking Up 2%On an earnings call, CEO J.K. Symancyk discussed what’s working for the company and how it’s preparing for the potential impact of tariffs.
SurveysJun 03, 2025
Consumer Confidence Improves in May The index partially rebounded after months of decline, due in part to the U.S.-China deal to temporarily reduce import tariffs.
CollectionsJun 03, 2025
Dakota Johnson Is Roberto Coin’s New Brand AmbassadorThe actress stars in the latest campaign set in Venice, Italy, and is set to participate in other creative initiatives for the jeweler.
GradingJun 03, 2025
Mason-Kay Jade Adds ‘Fei Cui’ to Jade ReportsThe company has joined other labs, including GIA and Lotus Gemology, in adopting the Chinese term for "jadeite jade."
SourcingJun 02, 2025
Gemfields’ June Auction to Include 36-Carat RubyThe large stone will be offered at its June sale along with a selection of secondary-type rubies from a new area of the Montepuez mine.
