ColumnistsMay 09, 2023
Creative Connecting: The Dos & Donts of Pre-Trade Show MarketingColumnistsMay 23, 2023
Squirrel Spotting: The Case of the Pricey Repair
When it comes to pricing jewelry repairs, you should start by asking a simple question about the piece at hand, Peter Smith writes.
Peter Smith is an industry consultant, speaker, sales trainer, and author. He can be reached via email at TheRetailSmiths@gmail.com.
After completing my sales “Masterclass” at a store recently, I had the good fortune of spending a few minutes with the gentleman who ran the repair shop for the company.
Ray was curious, conflicted even, about the inexact science of pricing repairs for the store’s customers.
As he explained it, he was constantly balancing competing interests each time he quoted a price for a repair.
There seemed to be a prevailing assumption that the customer always wanted the lowest price that could be offered.
The salespeople, more often than not, adopted the role of passionate advocates for the customer getting nothing less than the lowest price possible.
After all, they reasoned, the customer would surely consider them and the store in a poor light if the repair quote was perceived as too expensive.
On the other hand, and perhaps most poignantly, Ray believed that the customer’s best interests, and the store’s best interests, were better served by quoting a price that allowed the shop to deliver the finest repair possible.
Not the bare minimum, not the obligatory repair, but the absolute best job a craftsman could do.
That inherent conflict is, of course, not exclusive to quoting repairs. It is often true for special orders, for custom work, or for any of the many essentials that pepper our days in a typical retail environment.
In thinking about Ray’s pricing dilemma, it occurred to me that there are both practical and psychological factors at play.
We assume customers have a clear sense of what they should pay for repairs when, in fact, the opposite is often true. More often than not, a customer has absolutely no idea what a given repair should cost.
I recently engaged with an appliance repair man about what I perceived to be a small matter with my fridge and, when he let me know what was needed, I decided that it was time to invest in a new refrigerator, after 13 years of fine service.
I didn’t go into the conversation with the appliance repair guy with any awareness of what a repair should cost, and I didn’t immediately conclude that I was being “ripped off” when he listed the possible remedies and the costs of said repair.
The fridge conversation was very matter-of-fact. Certain things needed addressing, and if I wanted them done, it was going to cost me a few hundred dollars.
There was no emotional component to the conversation about my fridge, unless you count its devilment of being too accessible whenever I got even a hint of a craving … darn you to hell, fridge!
Ray was curious, conflicted even, about the inexact science of pricing repairs for the store’s customers.
As he explained it, he was constantly balancing competing interests each time he quoted a price for a repair.
There seemed to be a prevailing assumption that the customer always wanted the lowest price that could be offered.
The salespeople, more often than not, adopted the role of passionate advocates for the customer getting nothing less than the lowest price possible.
After all, they reasoned, the customer would surely consider them and the store in a poor light if the repair quote was perceived as too expensive.
On the other hand, and perhaps most poignantly, Ray believed that the customer’s best interests, and the store’s best interests, were better served by quoting a price that allowed the shop to deliver the finest repair possible.
Not the bare minimum, not the obligatory repair, but the absolute best job a craftsman could do.
That inherent conflict is, of course, not exclusive to quoting repairs. It is often true for special orders, for custom work, or for any of the many essentials that pepper our days in a typical retail environment.
In thinking about Ray’s pricing dilemma, it occurred to me that there are both practical and psychological factors at play.
We assume customers have a clear sense of what they should pay for repairs when, in fact, the opposite is often true. More often than not, a customer has absolutely no idea what a given repair should cost.
I recently engaged with an appliance repair man about what I perceived to be a small matter with my fridge and, when he let me know what was needed, I decided that it was time to invest in a new refrigerator, after 13 years of fine service.
I didn’t go into the conversation with the appliance repair guy with any awareness of what a repair should cost, and I didn’t immediately conclude that I was being “ripped off” when he listed the possible remedies and the costs of said repair.
The fridge conversation was very matter-of-fact. Certain things needed addressing, and if I wanted them done, it was going to cost me a few hundred dollars.
There was no emotional component to the conversation about my fridge, unless you count its devilment of being too accessible whenever I got even a hint of a craving … darn you to hell, fridge!
“Understanding what a given repair request really means is not a rationalization for overcharging the customer, but an indicator of the best course of action.” — Peter Smith
When it comes to jewelry repairs, believing the customer always expects the lowest price is to assume they have no emotional involvement with the piece in question.
We assume the exchange of payment for labor and materials is nothing more than pure economics just like my refrigerator, minus the edible goodies inside.
Mercifully that is not how the cookie crumbles, at least not every time.
There obviously are occasions when a customer must decide whether a given piece of jewelry matters enough to them to invest their hard-earned money in fixing it.
The condition of the piece may be such that the price of repair will determine whether they will have it fixed or return to whatever little drawer it was nestled in prior to the store visit.
More often than not, however, the jewelry in question is extremely meaningful to the customer. They have a strong emotional bond with the piece, whether it is an important family heirloom or otherwise.
It may have been something acquired or gifted that is imbued with meaning and symbolism. Its restoration might signal something much more profound than the sum total of labor hours and material costs.
Psychological research has definitively established that we place considerable value on things we already own, far beyond what any rational assessment by others might conclude. That means anything we currently own always will be worth more to us than things we have yet to acquire.
Understanding what a given repair request really means is not a rationalization for overcharging the customer, but an indicator of the best course of action.
If the sales or service person engages the customer and asks the right questions, they will have a better understanding of the customer’s emotional quotient.
Ask a simple question such as, “That’s a lovely ring. What’s its story?”
A discovery question like this will result in one of two outcomes.
The first suggests keeping the work a bare minimum, and the price consistent with a lesser effort and fewer materials. And a second option that demands a much higher level of deliverable at a very different price.
The two prices can be offered to the customer (we all love to have choices and control) with a necessary proviso and a strong recommendation.
“Look, we can do the repair for ‘x’ and it will get back to wearable condition. However, I fear that such a repair is a temporary fix and I worry you may have issues down the road.”
That solution might be just what the doctor ordered for the customer, and the qualifier about future issues will have been delivered as a necessary note of caution.
Depending on your conversation with the customer it might also warrant a very different recommendation, such as: “On the other hand, this is what we should do, and it will likely take care of those problems for years to come.
“It is your decision, but I would strongly recommend the second option as I want you to have the absolute best outcome when you pick your ring up next week. What would you like to do?”
If the customer has minimal emotional investment in the ring, they may choose the least expensive option, the bare minimum to make the ring wearable.
If, however, they have a strong emotional investment in their ring, they will want and expect the absolute best repair and restoration possible.
Do the work of engagement and discovery, stop spending from your own pocket, and remember, the very best value is always a satisfied customer.
Happy selling!
More on Columnists
The Latest
IndependentsDec 30, 2024
In Memoriam: Jewelry Industry Leaders and Innovators We Lost in 2024From groundbreaking designers to dedicated retailers, National Jeweler pays tribute to the colleagues we bid farewell to this year.
MajorsDec 30, 2024
Saks Global Finalizes Acquisition of Neiman MarcusThe retailer’s portfolio now includes Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Saks Off 5th.
Events & AwardsDec 30, 2024
Registration Now Open for JIS Spring 2025The jewelry trade show is set for March 9-11 in Miami.
Brought to you by
A Diamond Is Forever Celebrates "Forever Present" Holiday CampaignA Diamond is Forever hosted a holiday celebration in honor of their new marketing campaign, ‘Forever Present.’
IndependentsDec 30, 2024
MJSA Elects New Board ChairEdward N. DeCristofaro, who served as MJSA’s board chair from 2012 to 2014, is returning to the role.
Weekly QuizDec 27, 2024
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
MajorsDec 27, 2024
Buccellati to Expand Workforce by 500 Employees Over Next Three YearsThe Richemont-owned company is investing in its jewelry production and watchmaking workshops.
SourcingDec 27, 2024
IDCA Announces 2025 Board MembersManoj Bhandari, a principal of RMC Gems Inc., is the new president of the Indian Diamond & Colorstone Association.
Brought to you by
De Beers Group Launches Holiday Campaign for Natural Diamonds‘Forever Present’ campaign revives the iconic A Diamond is Forever tagline and celebrates the diamond dream.
Events & AwardsDec 27, 2024
18 Designers Graduate from WJA’s Jewelry Loupe ProjectThe designers participated in a six-month business development and mentorship program to develop and launch their jewelry collections.
MajorsDec 24, 2024
Nordstrom Family, Partner to Take Retailer Private in $6B DealMembers of the founding family have partnered with Mexican retail company El Puerto de Liverpool to acquire Nordstrom.
MajorsDec 24, 2024
Boucheron Bets on Las VegasThe brand has opened its second U.S. location in the Fontainebleau resort and casino.
EditorsDec 24, 2024
The Spectrum Jewels I Want to Find Under the Tree Associate Editor Lauren McLemore highlights pieces from the AGTA Spectrum & Cutting Edge Awards she’d be thrilled to unwrap on Christmas.
SourcingDec 24, 2024
Gemfields to Temporarily Suspend Emerald MiningThe move is one of several cost-cutting measures outlined by the company as it faces a weaker luxury market and other challenges.
IndependentsDec 23, 2024
Philadelphia 76ers’ Tyrese Maxey Stars in The 1916 Company’s New CampaignThe retailer’s “On the Clock” campaign celebrates how time, precision, and purpose come together.
EditorsDec 23, 2024
My Favorite Piece of the Week Jewels of 2024Associate Editor Natalie Francisco chose her 12 favorite Piece of the Week picks from the year gone by.
GradingDec 23, 2024
GIA Adds Filler Identification to Emerald ReportsLab clients have the option to request this addition on their emerald reports.
Events & AwardsDec 20, 2024
Two Participants Complete Inaugural Ella Klein InternshipJamie Dunton and Gabriella Botelho are the first graduates of the program, created by the WJA Foundation and Julius Klein Diamonds.
CollectionsDec 20, 2024
Piece of the Week: Retrouvaí’s Ring for CharityIn the spirit of giving, Retrouvaí will donate $4,000 from the sale of this ring to the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank.
IndependentsDec 19, 2024
Michigan’s DeVries Jewelers Unveils New Location in Time for the HolidaysCo-owner Dan DeVries shared what it’s like moving into a space triple the size of its old store and how it feels to be a “real jeweler” now.
CollectionsDec 19, 2024
State Property Transforms Spain’s Generalife Gardens into JewelryAlong with the latest “Gardens” collection, the brand has released limited-edition designs offering more indulgent pieces.
CrimeDec 19, 2024
Alleged Jewelry Thieves Attempt Rowboat EscapeThe man and woman are accused of stealing jewelry from a shipping container then trying to flee by paddling a small boat out into a bay.
SourcingDec 19, 2024
The Second-Largest Diamond Ever Found Now Has a Name The 2,488-carat diamond recovered from a mine in Botswana has been dubbed “Motswedi” while its 1,094-carat sibling is “Seriti.”
SourcingDec 19, 2024
Gemfields Reports Record Ruby Auction Results Despite Challenges at SourceThe average price per carat hit a record high for the miner, which said it remains unaffected by the conflict in Mozambique.
AuctionsDec 18, 2024
Alexandrite Ring Sells for Record-Setting $1.9M at Sotheby’sThe nearly 17-carat stone made history for the color-change gem that, according to the auction house, is experiencing a “notable surge” in the market.
WatchesDec 18, 2024
Historic Titanic Pocket Watch Winds Its Way Back to Tiffany & Co. More than a century after survivors gifted a Tiffany timepiece to the captain of the ship that rescued them, the jeweler has reclaimed it.
TechnologyDec 18, 2024
Picchiotti Utilizes AI in ‘Spotlight’ Video CampaignThe videos highlight how pieces from the “Xpandable” and “Reversible Xpandable” collections put the wearer in the spotlight.
IndependentsDec 18, 2024
Industry Veteran Steve Feldman Set to RetireFeldman reflected on 45 years in the jewelry industry and clarified that it’s not a total retirement.
