ColumnistsFeb 07, 2023
Creative Connecting: Top Social Media Tools for 2023ColumnistsFeb 14, 2023
Squirrel Spotting: Examining Retail’s Uneasy Relationship With Brands
Peter Smith understands retailers’ issues with brands but, he argues, brands work. Here’s why.
Peter Smith is an industry consultant, speaker, sales trainer, and author. He can be reached via email at TheRetailSmiths@gmail.com.
I recently joined a Facebook group called “Jewelry: Our Business, Our Passion,” and I confess it is refreshing to engage in a supportive and positive forum on the industry we love so well.
One of the retailer members posed a question on the site recently and, not for the first time, it really got me thinking about the topic in question.
The retailer had asked what members’ opinions were regarding brands in their stores and went on to express his own view about why he wasn’t a fan. He is, of course, not alone in dismissing the relevance of brands.
To be clear, when we talk about brands in our industry, we are, with just two or three exceptions, talking about trade brands. Other than Rolex, Pandora, and David Yurman, there is virtually no unaided consumer awareness of even the best known brands in our space.
BusinessInsider’s list of the Top 100 Brands according to consumers includes Gucci and Chanel.
It even has Crocs and Dunkin’ (previously Dunkin’ Donuts for those not familiar with that brand’s evolution) but the only jewelry brand in the top 100 is Tiffany & Co.
With less than a handful of exceptions, given that we are talking about trade brands, should retailers bother with brands at all? That was the question asked by the retailer on the Facebook page.
The list of retailer grievances with brands (justified or otherwise) is long. It includes the following.
1. The brand does not drive customers into the store.
2. Demands for case space are often unreasonable.
3. The buy-ins can often be prohibitive.
4. There are ongoing demands to replenish sold goods.
5. New products are expected to be bought, with no returns if they don’t work.
6. Margins are often worse than on generic equivalents.
7. Rebalance terms can be unfair.
8. Brands often “change the rules” mid-game, frustrating the retailer.
9. Brands don’t always participate with co-op and marketing initiatives.
10. Some brands rarely send personnel and can fall short on training.
11. Certain brands regularly change personnel, making it hard to build relationships.
12. Many brands have their own direct-to-consumer efforts (online and/or stores) and are perceived to be competing with their own retailer partners.
One of the retailer members posed a question on the site recently and, not for the first time, it really got me thinking about the topic in question.
The retailer had asked what members’ opinions were regarding brands in their stores and went on to express his own view about why he wasn’t a fan. He is, of course, not alone in dismissing the relevance of brands.
To be clear, when we talk about brands in our industry, we are, with just two or three exceptions, talking about trade brands. Other than Rolex, Pandora, and David Yurman, there is virtually no unaided consumer awareness of even the best known brands in our space.
BusinessInsider’s list of the Top 100 Brands according to consumers includes Gucci and Chanel.
It even has Crocs and Dunkin’ (previously Dunkin’ Donuts for those not familiar with that brand’s evolution) but the only jewelry brand in the top 100 is Tiffany & Co.
With less than a handful of exceptions, given that we are talking about trade brands, should retailers bother with brands at all? That was the question asked by the retailer on the Facebook page.
The list of retailer grievances with brands (justified or otherwise) is long. It includes the following.
1. The brand does not drive customers into the store.
2. Demands for case space are often unreasonable.
3. The buy-ins can often be prohibitive.
4. There are ongoing demands to replenish sold goods.
5. New products are expected to be bought, with no returns if they don’t work.
6. Margins are often worse than on generic equivalents.
7. Rebalance terms can be unfair.
8. Brands often “change the rules” mid-game, frustrating the retailer.
9. Brands don’t always participate with co-op and marketing initiatives.
10. Some brands rarely send personnel and can fall short on training.
11. Certain brands regularly change personnel, making it hard to build relationships.
12. Many brands have their own direct-to-consumer efforts (online and/or stores) and are perceived to be competing with their own retailer partners.
“The fact your customers may not come in asking for a particular brand does not mean that they wouldn’t be better served by having that option.” — Peter Smith
The above list is hardly reflective of all brands in our space, and there are many companies that really care about their retailers and do many of those things well. It would take another column to discuss that list and provide a counter argument as to why some of those things might not feel right to the retailers but are, in fact, good business. I’ll touch on just two as examples.
Regarding No. 4 (replenishing bestsellers), what business argument can possibly be made for not replenishing bestsellers? They are the very products that drive the business and not replenishing them because other items with that brand haven’t sold well is a classic case of throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Regarding No. 12 (brands going direct to consumer), few if any trade brands can spend the kind of money necessary to create consumer awareness. To that end, thoughtful and well-placed branded stores can help to create awareness and set the tone for how that brand can live within its retail partner base.
If the best argument against such an initiative is that the brand is taking your customers, I might argue your view of the brand’s potential reach must be incredibly narrow. In that instance, perhaps your money would be better spent elsewhere?
Again, there are numerous points from the list that could be debated on both sides, but my objective was to just name some of them, not defend or invalidate them.
It seems appropriate to assert that even “trade brands” must adhere to the essential characteristics of branding, with quality, language, and presentation all elevated and consistently so. Simply putting a name on a range of goods and calling it a brand does not make it a brand.
The Question Itself Is Flawed
In many respects, whether retailers should carry brands or not is the wrong question. I have heard it asked hundreds of times in my career and, while it is reasonable on the surface, the real question should be, what does the buyer want?
I can hear the choruses of “our customers will buy what we sell” echoing as a I write this, but that is hardly the point. The fact your customers may not come in asking for a particular brand does not mean that they wouldn’t be better served by having that option.
Why Brands Work
Ming Hsu wrote in his piece, “Brand Equity,” in Consumer Neuroscience that, “Consumers that develop the habit of purchasing a particular brand, or product, from a specific channel may be less likely to search for information for alternatives, to deliberate about competing products, or to delay purchasing for the future.”
More so today than ever before, as the emergence of relevant brands that do not enjoy legacy status becomes more and more prevalent, brands serve as stories and can be thought of as such. One could even interchange the terms “stories” and “brands.” And stories are what move people to act, not a boring list of generic details that can be repeated (true or otherwise) by every jewelry store in the country.
Customers want their purchases to be a low-effort experience. Anything that lessens the cognitive burden will be given priority. Our brain craves automaticity beyond anything else, and it is essentially a lazy piece of meat that consumes only 20 percent of our body’s energy. It will take any shortcut necessary to lessen anxiety and stress, and to make the buying experience easier.
In “Buy-ology, Truths and Lies About Why We Buy,” Martin Lindstrom wrote, “There’s something about the ritual-like act of collecting that makes us feel safe and secure. When we are stressed out, or when life feels random and out of control, we often seek out comfort in familiar products or objects. We want to have solid, consistent patterns in our lives, and in our brands.”
Customers want to be engaged emotionally, not bored with a laundry list of generic boasts.
A brand, even a trade brand, ought to have a story, and that story is what resonates with customers. It is that story they repeat in their conversations with family and friends, and it is that story that makes it easy for them to come back again and repeat purchase the brand.
A brand’s effect on customers is literally chemical. As the customer experiences the brand (in wearing and telling), they enjoy the positive feeling of a dopamine rush in their brain. It is the best embodiment of how buying luxury makes you feel different, and not just look different.
Another solid consumer consideration for branding is what psychologists term the scarcity effect.
In essence, consumers are more apt to be drawn to a product if it has limited availability. That does not mean that no other retailers carry the brand, but that most other retailers do not. Within that, there may be added incentives, such as early previews on new products or limited numbers of a collection or item. This effect can work even if you have created a private-label brand, provided it behaves like a real brand.
Again, if you are trying to be all things to all people or deluding yourself into believing that the entirety of your generic offerings are, by default, your private label, I suspect few people will be convinced.
“People spend more on brands. They know they are spending more, and yet research shows they are happy to do so.” — Peter Smith
Why Branding Make Sense for Retailers
While there is much debate about the viability of brands in the retail jewelry environment, there can be little doubt that the vast majority of retailers do in fact carry some brands.
To quote branding expert Lindstrom again, “Expect anything and everything to be branded in the future because as our brain-scan study has shown, our brains are hardwired to bestow upon brands an almost religious significance and as a result we forge immutable brand loyalties.”
One of the best learning exercises in understanding the jewelry business is to get outside of it and view our world from a different perspective. To that end, if you are still uncertain about the viability of brands, ask yourself what other industries are largely non-branded? Better still, ask yourself what luxury products outside of our business are non-branded?
In a world where we are seeing declining foot traffic and probably will continue to for the foreseeable future, increasing your average ticket should be a core strategic initiative for every retail operator. As it happens, people spend more on brands. They know they are spending more, and yet research shows they are happy to do so.
In “Brainfluence, 100 Ways to Persuade and Convince Consumers With Neuromarketing,” Roger Dooley wrote: “On one hand, we know that the pain of paying kicks in when people perceive that a product is overpriced and makes people less likely to make a purchase. But now we have multiple studies showing that people enjoy a product more when they pay more for it.”
One of the arguments previously cited against branding is that people don’t come in often enough (occasionally, not at all) asking for a given brand. Again, that does not mean that it is not the best option for your customers.
Brands, especially trade brands, need to be championed from leadership. There needs to be clear communication about why a given brand matters to your business and a clear directive about why it should matter to your customers.
Because you can make it yourself, knock it off, or tweak your own generic or custom options does not mean that you should.
Absent the legal issues, the moral issues, or even the inefficiency of taking the time to build what can easily be ordered, it just might not be the best option for your customers.
We live in a branded world. And, thankfully, when we buy brands, unless and until they disappoint us, we are happy to continue buying them ongoing.
As Lindstrom wrote, “… branding as we know it is just beginning.”
More on Columnists
The Latest
Events & AwardsDec 20, 2024
Two Participants Complete Inaugural Ella Klein InternshipJamie Dunton and Gabriella Botelho are the first graduates of the program, created by the WJA Foundation and Julius Klein Diamonds.
CollectionsDec 20, 2024
Piece of the Week: Retrouvaí’s Ring for CharityIn the spirit of giving, Retrouvaí will donate $4,000 from the sale of this ring to the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank.
IndependentsDec 19, 2024
Michigan’s DeVries Jewelers Unveils New Location in Time for the HolidaysCo-owner Dan DeVries shared what it’s like moving into a space triple the size of its old store and how it feels to be a “real jeweler” now.
Brought to you by
De Beers Group Launches Holiday Campaign for Natural Diamonds‘Forever Present’ campaign revives the iconic A Diamond is Forever tagline and celebrates the diamond dream.
CollectionsDec 19, 2024
State Property Transforms Spain’s Generalife Gardens into JewelryAlong with the latest “Gardens” collection, the brand has released limited-edition designs offering more indulgent pieces.
Weekly QuizDec 19, 2024
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
CrimeDec 19, 2024
Alleged Jewelry Thieves Attempt Rowboat EscapeThe man and woman are accused of stealing jewelry from a shipping container then trying to flee by paddling a small boat out into a bay.
SourcingDec 19, 2024
The Second-Largest Diamond Ever Found Now Has a Name The 2,488-carat diamond recovered from a mine in Botswana has been dubbed “Motswedi” while its 1,094-carat sibling is “Seriti.”
Brought to you by
Advocacy and Excellence: How Jewelers of America Is Committed to Elevating Our Industry For over a century, Jewelers of America has been the voice of the industry and valuable resource to jewelers across the country.
SourcingDec 19, 2024
Gemfields Reports Record Ruby Auction Results Despite Challenges at SourceThe average price per carat hit a record high for the miner, which said it remains unaffected by the conflict in Mozambique.
AuctionsDec 18, 2024
Alexandrite Ring Sells for Record-Setting $1.9M at Sotheby’sThe nearly 17-carat stone made history for the color-change gem that, according to the auction house, is experiencing a “notable surge” in the market.
WatchesDec 18, 2024
Historic Titanic Pocket Watch Winds Its Way Back to Tiffany & Co. More than a century after survivors gifted a Tiffany timepiece to the captain of the ship that rescued them, the jeweler has reclaimed it.
TechnologyDec 18, 2024
Picchiotti Utilizes AI in ‘Spotlight’ Video CampaignThe videos highlight how pieces from the “Xpandable” and “Reversible Xpandable” collections put the wearer in the spotlight.
IndependentsDec 18, 2024
Industry Veteran Steve Feldman Set to RetireFeldman reflected on 45 years in the jewelry industry and clarified that it’s not a total retirement.
Events & AwardsDec 17, 2024
Chanel to Receive Gem Award for High Jewelry ExcellenceThe luxury brand is being honored for excellence in high jewelry design in its “Haute Joaillerie Sport” collection.
SourcingDec 17, 2024
Frank Circelli, Founder of Gem Shopping Network, Dies at 75Circelli was a pioneer in the world of TV shopping who is remembered for his passion for gemstones and his big personality.
AuctionsDec 17, 2024
Blue Diamond Fetches $8.8M at Christie’sThe nearly 6-carat stone headlined the recent jewelry auction, which also featured Mica Ertegun’s jewelry.
CrimeDec 17, 2024
‘Black Bin Crew’ Robbers Get 14-16 Years in Prison The three men, who got their nickname because they’d toss the jewelry they stole into black plastic bins, were arrested back in August.
TrendsDec 16, 2024
Marion Fasel’s New Book Delves Into the History of Engagement Rings“The History of Diamond Engagement Rings: A True Romance” is a 128-page small-format book containing more than 165 images.
WatchesDec 16, 2024
Take a Look Inside the New Rolex Boutique on Rodeo DriveGearys opened a 6,200-square-foot Rolex store with a design that pays homage to the brand’s connection to the ocean.
GradingDec 16, 2024
GCAL By Sarine Expands 8X to 2 More Fancy Shapes The diamond cut grade is now available for marquise- and pear-shaped diamonds.
SourcingDec 16, 2024
Diamonds Do Good Announces 2025 Award RecipientsDDG said the honorees’ business practices embody a commitment to positive social impact, industry innovation, and community empowerment.
TrendsDec 13, 2024
Selena Gomez Said ‘Forever Begins Now’ to Marquise Diamond Engagement RingEstimates on the size and value of the solitaire diamond, which is mounted on a diamond pavé-set yellow gold band, vary.
TrendsDec 13, 2024
Piece of the Week: Martin Katz’s Tanzanite Drops These half-moon tanzanite earrings totaling 25 carats are part of a special trunk show taking place this weekend in Dallas.
Recorded WebinarsDec 13, 2024
Watch: The Highs and Lows of 2024The National Jeweler editors recap the top news, the best jewels, and their favorite stories of the year.
AuctionsDec 12, 2024
Tom Brady’s Watches Top $4M at Sotheby’s AuctionThe highest-grossing lot of the sale was the retired QB’s Rolex Paul Newman Daytona “John Player Special.”
SourcingDec 12, 2024
Grizzly Emerald Auction Garners $22.4MRecent expansion initiatives at the Zambian emerald mine have shown strong production numbers, said Grizzly founder Abdoulaye Ndiaye.
MajorsDec 12, 2024
Mark Henry Appoints New Director of SalesCarrie Forman joins the brand to guide it into the next phase of growth with major and independent retailers in the U.S. and abroad.
