CrimeFeb 27, 2026
Man Charged in Murders of Father, Son Jewelers in ChicagoChicago police and members of the U.S. Marshals Service tracked down the 35-year-old suspect earlier this week in St. Louis.
EditorsDec 09, 2019
What Tiffany’s Acquisition Means for the Jewelry Industry
Looking at what makes Tiffany & Co. worth $16 billion says a lot about what consumers value, Associate Editor Lenore Fedow writes in her analysis of the deal.
A “Tiffany Setting V” band ring , a “Tiffany True” engagement ring, a “Tiffany Soleste” band ring, and a “Tiffany T True” narrow ring. Luxury conglomerate LVMH is set to acquire the well-known jeweler in a deal valued at $16.5 billion. (Photo credit: Tiffany & Co.)
Life as the resident retail reporter at National Jeweler can be a bit of a bummer.
It’s an unofficial and self-bestowed title, but if stores are closing or companies are going bankrupt, I tend to cover it.
Truly, I like my beat. I do my best work when I’m elbow-deep in quarterly reports and court documents.
But when the rumors of LVMH’s acquisition of Tiffany & Co. began to fly, I felt a bit uneasy.
As a lifelong New Yorker, I have a soft spot for Tiffany. My everyday jewelry, the pieces I consider a part of me, all came in a little blue box.
I see the company as an American icon and quintessentially New York, and I wasn’t sure how to feel about a French luxury conglomerate buying it.
As a reporter covering retail, I mulled over what the deal would mean for Tiffany and, more broadly, for the jewelry industry at large.
So I picked the brains of experts and analysts, and I’ve come to you with my findings.
Here’s what makes Tiffany so valuable and why those factors matter to the overall industry.
Tiffany brings a strong brand to the table.
Amid reports of a potential acquisition, Tiffany confirmed in October it had received an unsolicited bid from LVMH for $120 per share, valuing the company at $14.5 billion.
After talks with LVMH, Tiffany reportedly asked the company to up the bid to $130, believing the company was worth more.
And Tiffany was right. The final deal was for $135 per share, or $16.2 billion, one of the largest transactions in LVMH’s history.
Tiffany was able to command big bucks, in part, because of the strength of its brand.
Flavio Cereda, an equity analyst at Jeffries, stated in a note written prior to the deal that Tiffany’s “brand equity and the strength of the image of its iconic 1837 Blue Box are more valuable than the current financials suggest.”
“LVMH, with all its brands, does not have a strong, solid diamond jewelry brand like Tiffany or that caters to Tiffany’s clientele,” industry analyst Edahn Golan wrote in an email to National Jeweler.
LVMH’s watch and jewelry portfolio consists of Chaumet, Bulgari, Fred, Hublot, TAG Heuer, and Zenith.
“Of the six companies in LVMH’s watch & jewelry group, only Chaumet is a diamond jewelry company, which means that the group has a lot of room to grow,” he said.
From its trademark Tiffany Blue color to the white ribbon around its
boxes, Tiffany’s strong brand presence is a valuable asset.
The rise of brands was a major takeaway from De Beers’ 2019 Diamond Insight Report, which noted the popularity of branded jewelry, particularly in the diamond engagement ring space.
Branded jewelry represents two-fifths of sales of commitment jewelry in the United States, said De Beers.
The report also highlighted the resonance of brands with same-sex couples and millennials.
Tiffany’s vertical integration is valuable.
“Tiffany checked all the boxes,” industry analyst Paul Zimnisky said in an interview with National Jeweler Friday, noting that while the standalone brand was the most important aspect of the deal, its vertical integration is certainly the second.
Luca Soltani, senior research analyst for luxury goods at research firm Bernstein, echoed Zimnisky’s sentiment on vertical integration.
“It is clearly an advantage—especially when we look at the bridal products,” Soltani said in an email to National Jeweler.
Zimnisky wasn’t surprised by the acquisition, as rumors had been swirling in the space for a while, but said he was surprised LVMH didn’t make a bid last year during the stock market sell-off.
Then again, “not a lot of acquisitions could move the needle for them,” he said, noting the size and wealth of the luxury conglomerate.
LVMH has the money to spend, but what it lacks are the sourcing and manufacturing connections that Tiffany maintains.
LVMH Chief Financial Officer Jean-Jacques Guiony said as much in a conference call with analysts following the deal, highlighting Tiffany’s “very high level of vertical integration, compared with our brands.”
“[Tiffany] realized early on that vertical integration will give it better access to the goods it needs, and at better prices too,” said analyst Golan.
The company’s vertical integration efforts began 20 years ago, Tiffany CEO Alessandro Bogliolo said in an interview with Bloomberg.
Tiffany established Laurelton Diamonds, a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary, in 2002.
It’s a De Beers sightholder and has inked long-term rough supply agreements with Alrosa and Dominion Diamond.
Bogliolo noted that 80 to 90 percent of its polished diamonds above 0.18 carats come from its workshops.
Tiffany also holds a stake in a diamond mine in South Africa owned by Canadian mining company Diamcor, a company spokesperson confirmed.
At a time when provenance and supply chain transparency are becoming increasingly important to consumers, Tiffany is ahead of the curve.
The jeweler began telling consumers the origin of its diamonds in January through its “Diamond Source Initiative.”
In that same Bloomberg interview, Bogliolo estimated the move toward sustainability cost Tiffany tens of millions of dollars over the years but added that it differentiates Tiffany from other jewelry companies.
“The reason why we are so selective with our sourcing is to avoid either mines that are not compliant with safety requirements, environmental protection, [and] human rights respect,” he said.
Tiffany, for example, does not source from Zimbabwe or the Congo due to internal issues in the countries, even if the diamonds meet Kimberley Process standards, he said.
“Tiffany is a very big player in all sorts of diamonds, and it’s something where the sourcing is not easy to do, and we expect to benefit from that,” LVMH’s Guiroy said on the call.
Tiffany boarded the sustainability train early.
With Tiffany’s vertical integration comes its ability to have a greater say in the means of production, a valuable asset at a time when climate change and environmental issues are weighing heavy on the minds of many consumers.
The younger, affluent generation are socially and environmentally conscious and hold luxury brands to high standards, particularly sustainable and ethical production processes, said Deloitte in its Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2019 survey.
The rise of brands was a major takeaway from De Beers’ 2019 Diamond Insight Report, which noted the popularity of branded jewelry, particularly in the diamond engagement ring space.
Branded jewelry represents two-fifths of sales of commitment jewelry in the United States, said De Beers.
The report also highlighted the resonance of brands with same-sex couples and millennials.
Tiffany’s vertical integration is valuable.
“Tiffany checked all the boxes,” industry analyst Paul Zimnisky said in an interview with National Jeweler Friday, noting that while the standalone brand was the most important aspect of the deal, its vertical integration is certainly the second.
Luca Soltani, senior research analyst for luxury goods at research firm Bernstein, echoed Zimnisky’s sentiment on vertical integration.
“It is clearly an advantage—especially when we look at the bridal products,” Soltani said in an email to National Jeweler.
Zimnisky wasn’t surprised by the acquisition, as rumors had been swirling in the space for a while, but said he was surprised LVMH didn’t make a bid last year during the stock market sell-off.
Then again, “not a lot of acquisitions could move the needle for them,” he said, noting the size and wealth of the luxury conglomerate.
LVMH has the money to spend, but what it lacks are the sourcing and manufacturing connections that Tiffany maintains.
LVMH Chief Financial Officer Jean-Jacques Guiony said as much in a conference call with analysts following the deal, highlighting Tiffany’s “very high level of vertical integration, compared with our brands.”
“[Tiffany] realized early on that vertical integration will give it better access to the goods it needs, and at better prices too,” said analyst Golan.
The company’s vertical integration efforts began 20 years ago, Tiffany CEO Alessandro Bogliolo said in an interview with Bloomberg.
Tiffany established Laurelton Diamonds, a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary, in 2002.
It’s a De Beers sightholder and has inked long-term rough supply agreements with Alrosa and Dominion Diamond.
Bogliolo noted that 80 to 90 percent of its polished diamonds above 0.18 carats come from its workshops.
Tiffany also holds a stake in a diamond mine in South Africa owned by Canadian mining company Diamcor, a company spokesperson confirmed.
At a time when provenance and supply chain transparency are becoming increasingly important to consumers, Tiffany is ahead of the curve.
The jeweler began telling consumers the origin of its diamonds in January through its “Diamond Source Initiative.”
In that same Bloomberg interview, Bogliolo estimated the move toward sustainability cost Tiffany tens of millions of dollars over the years but added that it differentiates Tiffany from other jewelry companies.
“The reason why we are so selective with our sourcing is to avoid either mines that are not compliant with safety requirements, environmental protection, [and] human rights respect,” he said.
Tiffany, for example, does not source from Zimbabwe or the Congo due to internal issues in the countries, even if the diamonds meet Kimberley Process standards, he said.
“Tiffany is a very big player in all sorts of diamonds, and it’s something where the sourcing is not easy to do, and we expect to benefit from that,” LVMH’s Guiroy said on the call.
Tiffany boarded the sustainability train early.
With Tiffany’s vertical integration comes its ability to have a greater say in the means of production, a valuable asset at a time when climate change and environmental issues are weighing heavy on the minds of many consumers.
The younger, affluent generation are socially and environmentally conscious and hold luxury brands to high standards, particularly sustainable and ethical production processes, said Deloitte in its Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2019 survey.
“This implies an important lesson for luxury brands that want to retain these customers: they need to evolve towards new models of ethical and sustainable luxury.”
In addition to its diamond sourcing standards, the jeweler has been mindful of metals.
A decade ago, Tiffany was the first jewelry company to speak out against the development of the never-built Pebble Mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay, holding a screening of a documentary about the importance of the watershed, “Red Gold,” in New York.
It was one of the first jewelers to use gold sourced from the “Salmon Gold” initiative, which aims to mine gold in a way that’s mindful of the habits of salmon and other fish.
The Deloitte study highlights Tiffany’s responsible sourcing as well as its social and environmental work, particularly its philanthropic foundations focusing on reef conservation and awareness for responsible mining.
Tiffany created its “Save the Wild” collection in 2017, donating all profits, totaling more than $5 million, to the Wildlife Conservation Network.
And the company’s over-the-top holiday catalog offers an 11-day safari in Kenya and a set of animal-shaped diamond brooches, with a portion of the proceeds going to the animal conservation charity.
Tiffany is doing well in a key market—China.
Luxury brands across the board are grappling with U.S.-China trade tensions. Simultaneously, political unrest in Hong Kong is weighing heavy on balance sheets.
Tiffany, however, is still seeing double-digit growth in mainland China and highlighted higher spending by locals in its third-quarter results.
The jeweler currently has 35 stores in mainland China and 10 in Hong Kong.
LVMH’s third-quarter results also reported strong growth in Asia, and it has a strong enough foothold in the country to propel Tiffany even further in the growing market.
Jefferies analyst Cereda said LVMH may leverage the strength of Tiffany’s brand to target the Asian millennial market.
“I could definitely see that happening,” said Reginald Brack, executive director at NPD and an industry analyst on watches and luxury, in an interview with National Jeweler Friday.
“I think that Asian millennial luxury consumer is what most luxury brands now are trying to target. Tiffany is well-poised and positioned to capitalize on that with their immense brand recognition.”
The future of Tiffany may mean fewer stores.
Cereda noted Tiffany’s move into China may mean a “rethinking of the current product mix and its U.S. footprint.”
Bernstein analyst Soltani said Tiffany’s position in the United States is a strength, but that perhaps, “LVMH would want to upgrade the Tiffany flagship stores, and streamline the rest of the retail network.”
Tiffany’s flagship New York City store will undergo renovations after the holiday, and the retailer will move the store into a temporary, nearby space until it’s completed.
He said in secondary locations, Tiffany could “use a lighter (and smaller) retail format.”
NPD analyst Brack had the opportunity to visit a new Tiffany concept store in Tokyo, which he described as an “industrial loft space” that included a permanent DJ booth.
He said the items were more accessible, out there in the open to touch, and the space had a personalization bar.
An openness to change in an ever-changing retail environment is critical and when you have a strong brand, you can afford to experiment a little.
This deal speaks to the industry at large.
What I’ve taken away from my discussion with experts and analysts is this: Looking at what makes Tiffany worth $16 billion says a lot about what consumers value.
To compare Tiffany with independent jewelers is incongruous in some respects but, overall, understanding what matters to the customer is vital to any business.
Tiffany has: a strong brand, control of aspects of production, a focus on responsible sourcing and sustainability, and an eye for the retail experience.
Whether upping your social media game or talking more with your customers about the journey their jewelry has taken, you can take away something actionable from this historic deal.
In addition to its diamond sourcing standards, the jeweler has been mindful of metals.
A decade ago, Tiffany was the first jewelry company to speak out against the development of the never-built Pebble Mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay, holding a screening of a documentary about the importance of the watershed, “Red Gold,” in New York.
It was one of the first jewelers to use gold sourced from the “Salmon Gold” initiative, which aims to mine gold in a way that’s mindful of the habits of salmon and other fish.
The Deloitte study highlights Tiffany’s responsible sourcing as well as its social and environmental work, particularly its philanthropic foundations focusing on reef conservation and awareness for responsible mining.
Tiffany created its “Save the Wild” collection in 2017, donating all profits, totaling more than $5 million, to the Wildlife Conservation Network.
And the company’s over-the-top holiday catalog offers an 11-day safari in Kenya and a set of animal-shaped diamond brooches, with a portion of the proceeds going to the animal conservation charity.
Tiffany is doing well in a key market—China.
Luxury brands across the board are grappling with U.S.-China trade tensions. Simultaneously, political unrest in Hong Kong is weighing heavy on balance sheets.
Tiffany, however, is still seeing double-digit growth in mainland China and highlighted higher spending by locals in its third-quarter results.
The jeweler currently has 35 stores in mainland China and 10 in Hong Kong.
LVMH’s third-quarter results also reported strong growth in Asia, and it has a strong enough foothold in the country to propel Tiffany even further in the growing market.
Jefferies analyst Cereda said LVMH may leverage the strength of Tiffany’s brand to target the Asian millennial market.
“I could definitely see that happening,” said Reginald Brack, executive director at NPD and an industry analyst on watches and luxury, in an interview with National Jeweler Friday.
“I think that Asian millennial luxury consumer is what most luxury brands now are trying to target. Tiffany is well-poised and positioned to capitalize on that with their immense brand recognition.”
The future of Tiffany may mean fewer stores.
Cereda noted Tiffany’s move into China may mean a “rethinking of the current product mix and its U.S. footprint.”
Bernstein analyst Soltani said Tiffany’s position in the United States is a strength, but that perhaps, “LVMH would want to upgrade the Tiffany flagship stores, and streamline the rest of the retail network.”
Tiffany’s flagship New York City store will undergo renovations after the holiday, and the retailer will move the store into a temporary, nearby space until it’s completed.
He said in secondary locations, Tiffany could “use a lighter (and smaller) retail format.”
NPD analyst Brack had the opportunity to visit a new Tiffany concept store in Tokyo, which he described as an “industrial loft space” that included a permanent DJ booth.
He said the items were more accessible, out there in the open to touch, and the space had a personalization bar.
An openness to change in an ever-changing retail environment is critical and when you have a strong brand, you can afford to experiment a little.
This deal speaks to the industry at large.
What I’ve taken away from my discussion with experts and analysts is this: Looking at what makes Tiffany worth $16 billion says a lot about what consumers value.
To compare Tiffany with independent jewelers is incongruous in some respects but, overall, understanding what matters to the customer is vital to any business.
Tiffany has: a strong brand, control of aspects of production, a focus on responsible sourcing and sustainability, and an eye for the retail experience.
Whether upping your social media game or talking more with your customers about the journey their jewelry has taken, you can take away something actionable from this historic deal.
More on Editors
The Latest
SourcingFeb 27, 2026
South African Diamond Mine Closes Amid Search for Missing WorkersOwners of the Ekapa Mine reportedly filed for liquidation about a week after a mudslide trapped five workers who have yet to be found.
MajorsFeb 27, 2026
Jewelers Mutual to Donate $10M to Savannah College of Art and DesignA 10-year alliance has also begun to address the shortage of bench jewelers through scholarships, enhanced programs, and updated equipment.
Brought to you by
Is This You? Every Jeweler Has This Problem; We Have the Solution.Every jeweler faces the same challenge: helping customers protect what they love. Here’s the solution designed for today’s jewelry business.
CollectionsFeb 27, 2026
Renato Cipullo Turns Gold into HardstonesThe “Splendente” collection has evolved to feature hardstone letter pendants, including our Piece of the Week, the onyx “R.”
Weekly QuizFeb 26, 2026
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
AuctionsFeb 26, 2026
Noonans to Auction Lady Wardington’s JewelryThe jewelry collection belonged to “one of society's most glamorous and beautiful women of the mid-20th century,” said the auction house.
SourcingFeb 26, 2026
Anglo American CEO Gives Insight Into De Beers SaleThe update came as Anglo took its third write-down on the diamond miner and marketer, which lost more than $500 million in 2025.
Brought to you by
DCA Enters a New Chapter in Jewelry EducationWith refreshed branding, a new website, updated courses, and a pathway for growth, DCA is dedicated to supporting retail staff development.
ColumnistsFeb 26, 2026
Practical Ways Jewelers Can Leverage AI in 2026Emmanuel Raheb discusses the rise of “GEO” and the importance of having well-written, quality content on your website.
CrimeFeb 26, 2026
Three Sentenced in California Jewelry HeistEach received around four years for burglarizing a jewelry store and a coffee shop in Simi Valley, California, last May.
Events & AwardsFeb 26, 2026
GIA Names 2026 Jewelry Design Contest Winner, Retires Annual AwardCatherine Aulick, a GIA graduate, received the ninth and final Gianmaria Buccellati Foundation Award for Excellence in Jewelry Design.
TrendsFeb 25, 2026
Engagement Ring Trends 2026: What’s In, and WhyWe asked a jewelry historian, designer, bridal director, and wedding expert what’s trending in engagement rings. Here’s what they said.
SourcingFeb 25, 2026
7 Trends That Could Define the Diamond Industry’s FutureExperts from India weigh in the politics, policies, and market dynamics for diamantaires to monitor in 2026 and beyond.
PodcastsFeb 25, 2026
Episode 2: Jewelry Trends & Does the Red Carpet Matter?Are arm bands poised to make a comeback? Has red-carpet jewelry become boring? Find out on the second episode of the “My Next Question” podcast.
WatchesFeb 25, 2026
Private Equity Firms Write Down Value of Breitling, Report SaysThe Swiss watchmaker is battling declining sales amid a rapid retail expansion, according to a Financial Times report.
CollectionsFeb 25, 2026
Rahaminov Diamonds’ New Campaign Honors Its MatriarchThe campaign celebrates Giustina Pavanello Rahaminov, the co-founder’s wife and matriarch of the family-owned brand, for her 88th birthday.
IndependentsFeb 25, 2026
Borsheims Names 2025 ‘Ike-It’ Award WinnerRachel Bennett, a senior jeweler who has been with Borsheims since 2004, earned the award.
Policies & IssuesFeb 24, 2026
IEEPA Tariffs Terminated, New 10% Tariff Already ImposedAfter the Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs, President Trump imposed a 10 percent tax on almost all imports via a different law.
IndependentsFeb 24, 2026
Sherry Smith Now Principal Partner at The Retail SmithsThe industry veteran, who was with The Edge Retail Academy for 14 years, joins her husband at the company he founded in 2022.
IndependentsFeb 24, 2026
Yafa Signed Jewels to Open Store in MiamiThe vintage signed jewelry retailer chose Miami due to growing client demand in the city and the greater Latin American region.
WatchesFeb 24, 2026
Chrono24 Names New VP, U.S. General ManagerFormer Flight Club executive Jin Lee will bring his experience from the sneaker world to the pre-owned watch marketplace.
SourcingFeb 23, 2026
Designer Eddie Sakamoto, a Humble Artist, Dies at 72Sakamoto, who died in mid-January following a sudden illness, is remembered for his humility and his masterful, architectural designs.
Events & AwardsFeb 23, 2026
NYCJAOS Announces Four-Day Spring ShowThe April event will feature a new VIP shopping day requiring a special ticket.
TrendsFeb 23, 2026
Dua Lipa Is Bulgari’s New AmbassadorBulgari chose the British-Albanian singer-songwriter for her powerful and enduring voice in contemporary culture, the jeweler said.
Policies & IssuesFeb 20, 2026
Supreme Court Rules Against Most of President Trump’s TariffsIn a 6-3 ruling, the court said the president exceeded his authority when imposing sweeping tariffs under IEEPA.
ColumnistsFeb 20, 2026
Peter Smith: Happiness, Cavemen, and Jewelry SalesSmith encourages salespeople to ask customers questions that elicit the release of oxytocin, the brain’s “feel-good” chemical.
MajorsFeb 20, 2026
Jewelers Vigilance Committee Names Julie Yoakum Board ChairJVC also announced the election of five new board members.
