The family-owned jeweler will open a new showroom in Bel Air, Maryland, this fall.
To brand or not to brand?
Should jewelers ditch big-name labels and start promoting their store’s heritage as the “real brand?” Columnist Peter Smith dives into the great debate.

I read a piece this week on LinkedIn that implored independent retailers to stop buying brands. The writer was unapologetically negative about brands and argued that making the store’s heritage the “real brand experience” was the answer to driving more people into the stores and generating more business.
In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I presently make a living by helping retailers to brand themselves, but I have spent large chunks of my career on the branded side.
To that end, I am keenly aware of the great frustration that retailers have with many of the brands. The retailers often perceive that the brands are engaging in ever-more predatory practices, with demands to always buy more “stuff,” increase case space or build environments, send in sales reports on demand, champion new products before they have been tested or proven successful, spend more money on advertising and, ultimately, leave them alone at the altar when it comes to dated inventory. And, just when you think there couldn’t be any more demands, they sprinkle a little salt into your wounds by decreasing your margins.
Alas, the frustration cuts both ways. On the branded side, the vendors get very frustrated when their best-selling SKUs are not replenished, when memo sales are not reported, when the brand is not advertised, when bills don’t get paid on time and when they think the retailer has not provided a quality sales team to ensure success.
On a recent trip to the Midwest I heard from two retailers, both of whom were very brand-centric, complain bitterly about the increasing demands that were being placed on them by the big brands. Actually, it might be more accurate to say that the demands were coming from some big brands and from some, well … not-so-big brands.
The retailers’ exasperation at the perceived predatory practices of the brands was palpable. The two retailers expressed real annoyance at the never-ending litany of requests, requirements and reports that come at them from their branded vendors.
I’ll leave the discussion of what constitutes a “real brand” for another day, but what the best brands do (and they don’t have to be heritage or legacy brands) is to provide an emotional context for both the customer and the astute salesperson. Great brands also offer a very practical way to present products, tell stories and engage the
Shinola is a good example of a brand (without real heritage) that is telling a great story--Detroit manufacture and resurgence--and it seems to be resonating with retailers and customers alike. The brand has little to no history to tap into and yet it has generated an exciting buzz that translates to the sales floor.
Pandora, of late in the news for ending relationships with some of the people who “brought them to the dance,” played a very important role in helping many retailers survive the depths of the recession. Despite the chorus of “we’re in the jewelry business, not the bead business” from many retailers, the simple truth is that the brand was singularly responsible for creating traffic and generating cash flow when it was most needed.
On a lesser scale, and certainly in a much-improved environment, Alex and Ani is helping to drive traffic into retail doors today and, one would hope, creating an opportunity for retailers to meet new customers and to convert those customers into loyal patrons for other jewelry purchases.
Then, of course, there’s the industry giant, Rolex. Or, as the late Allen Brill referred to the company he led, “The Crown.” They continue to serve as the standard by which all other brands and “wannabe brands” aspire to. Despite the scope of the “ask,” Rolex enjoys a revered place in the industry and there would be few retailers, if they are being perfectly honest, who would not want to have Rolex in their stores.
When executed well, having the right brands, and telling brand stories, can be a gift to salespeople and can provide an important catalyst to elevate the customer experience. It also can elevate the perception of your store to your current and target customers. And, notwithstanding the few exceptions, it is also a way to protect margins, ensure consistency of product, provide exciting training content and provide differentiation for the retailer.
Believing, as the author of the aforementioned LinkedIn article intoned, that you ought to discard brands in favor of building upon your own heritage is, in my view, naïve. It presupposes that your heritage--with all due respect--matters one whit to young people today and any worthwhile retailing marketing strategy today must target millennials if the business is to sustain and grow.
The author wrote that the retailer should make the “store’s heritage, the real brand” and, with the utmost respect, that’s bunk. The Apple stores are not successful because of their heritage. Young people do not visit Starbucks because it was important to their grandparents. And even heritage brands like Tiffany & Co. and Polo are not successful because they have been around since 1837 and 1967, respectively.
These brands are successful, where many others have fallen short, because they are relevant to people today. Those brands speak to young customers in a way that resonates, both aesthetically (product) and narratively (what they say.) They don’t rely on the fact that they have been around for a long time and they do not approach their product development, marketing or staffing as though they are entitled to the business.
While your heritage can, and should, be a part of your messaging (has anyone done a better job than Tiffany in this regard?), what you really need to ask yourself is, why would a young person shop with you today? What is it that you do that is relevant to millennials?
Do you have products (brands or otherwise) that matter to them? Do you have people on your team that can relate to millennials? Does your marketing speak to a younger consumer? Have you created a truly energized environment that speaks to today’s consumer, or are you still doing the same things you were doing 10 and 20 years ago?
I was in Dallas this week and I asked a local retailer if he was getting young shoppers. He replied, “We deal more with the nearly-dead than the newly wed.” After the cursory chuckle, I re-phrased the question by asking him what he was doing to make sure that he was relevant to young people. His response was, “We have survived for 25 years.”
My reserves of cursory chuckles dried up at that point and I could almost hear the sucking sound of irrelevance, as I witnessed the advanced stages of another quiet demise.
Peter Smith, author of Hiring Squirrels, has spent 30 years building sales teams at retail and working with independent retailers to offer counsel and advice. He also has worked in both retail and wholesale with companies such as Tiffany & Co. and Hearts On Fire. He can be reached at Dublinsmith@yahoo.com and on LinkedIn.
The Latest

Amanda Ileana Hernandez is married to Carlos Hernandez, one of two men in prison for the 2024 murder of Michigan jeweler Hussein Murray.

The reimagined jewel, our Piece of the Week, trades the diamonds in the original 1998 design for blue, pink, yellow, and green sapphires.

Retailers are seeking new ways to attract customers, increase traffic, and create revenue – Estate buying events are a popular solution.

Sponsored by American Gem Trade Association


In the United States, second-quarter sales were flat amid soft consumer sentiment and lower in-store traffic.

The 22-karat gold egg, sold at Batemans Auctioneers in the U.K., was part of a 1980s treasure hunt ad campaign for Cadbury Creme Eggs.

Colored gemstones, artisan finishes, mixed metals, and meaningful details are shaping demand in bridal jewelry.

Lucara Diamond Corp., which recovered the “Motswedi” diamond from the Karowe mine, sold the stone for an undisclosed amount.

The expanded collections now feature hand-cut gemstones like topaz, tanzanite, chrysoprase, chalcedony, smoky quartz, and fire opal.

The lab-grown diamond jewelry brand’s newest boutique is in Westfield Valley Fair in Santa Clara, California.

The gemstone supplier and manufacturer acquired the remarkable 104-gram Zambian emerald at Gemfields’ auction in May.

Two suspects offered to trade the woman a “winning” lottery ticket for her jewelry.

Finsch has been in business rescue since May, and owner Petra Diamonds said it sees no viable path forward for the mine.

Michel Patrick DeSalles was sentenced after pleading guilty to the 2017 murder of Omid Gholian, who owned a jewelry store in Manhattan.

Longtime industry executive Beth Miller has taken on the role.

The brooch was owned by Virginia Fortune Ryan Ogilvy, who served as a lady of the bedchamber to Queen Elizabeth II for nearly 50 years.

Jamie Cygielman will take on the role on Aug. 24.

Moore, Polly’s husband, is remembered as a family man with an easygoing spirit and a love for sports and the outdoors.

Duvall O’Steen and Jen Cullen Williams share the best ways to display, present, and explain colored gemstones to younger customers.

The mid-year conference for jewelry and watch appraisers will take place Sept. 5-6 on Zoom.

Honest Hands Ring Co. Founder Benjamin Bosworth shared his thoughts on jewelry technology and why AI can never replace the human element.

QVC Group President and CEO David Rawlinson is temporarily being replaced by a familiar face, former QVC CEO Mike George.

The brand also added two one-of-a-kind brown diamond pieces to the “Sanssouci” series of its “Gardens” collection.

Ostbye took home top vendor honors at the Independent Jewelers Organization’s show, held last month in Kentucky.

Sponsored by Stratus Estate Buyers

Cloud, who will officially join Blue Nile on Monday, spent 26 years at Tiffany & Co. and founded jewelry brand Roseate.



















