Trade Court Declares Trump’s Tariffs Invalid
However, the tariffs remain in effect in the short term, as an appeals court has stayed the U.S. Court of International Trade’s decision.

New York—A ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) that invalidated President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs is on hold.
On Wednesday, a panel of three CIT judges issued a ruling that blocked the tariffs Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico, China, and 50-plus other countries by declaring an emergency under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA).
The judges found that the 1977 law does not give the president “unbounded authority” to “impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world.”
The Trump administration appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the appeals court stayed the CIT’s ruling on Thursday, less than 24 hours after it was handed down.
This means the tariffs will remain in effect until all appeals are finished.
Early in the year, Trump used the IEEPA to invoke levies on goods from Canada and Mexico in return for what his administration said was their role in allowing fentanyl to enter into the United States, and on China for failing to stop the flow of synthetic opioids into the U.S.
The trade court referred to these tariffs collectively as the “trafficking tariffs.”
In early April, the president invoked the IEEPA again when he announced a 10 percent duty on goods from all trading partners (the “worldwide tariffs”) and unveiled a list of 57 countries whose imports will face higher rates, ranging from 11-50 percent (the “retaliatory” tariffs).
The president imposed these tariffs in response to a national emergency related to what he views as an imbalance in the U.S. trade relationships and tariff rates, and U.S. trading partners’ economic policies that “suppress domestic wages and consumption, as indicated by large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits.”
Trump said these deficits pose an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.”
The announcement of the country-specific tariffs sent the jewelry industry into a tailspin, as many key countries in the supply chain were on the country-specific tariff list, including China, India, Thailand, Botswana, Vietnam, and Switzerland.
While the tariffs have since been lowered and paused, Wednesday’s ruling would have blocked them entirely.
In a member alert sent out Thursday morning, the Jewelers Vigilance Committee noted that while CIT’s ruling is a “positive” step toward the elimination of the IEEPA tariffs, nothing has changed in the short term.
Importers still need to declare all imports under the applicable tariff provisions and pay duties.
JVC also said in the alert that there will be a way for companies to claim refunds on tariffs paid if they are declared invalid.
There is nothing specific members need to do right now to preserve their rights to a refund, though JVC does recommend keeping “thorough” records of imports and duties paid.
The alert also notes that the court’s decision does not affect any of the Section 301 tariffs imposed on goods from China during the first Trump administration, and also does not impact the Section 232 tariffs imposed on other industries, including steel and aluminum.
Wednesday’s ruling came as the result of two cases brought before the court, one filed by a dozen states, led by Oregon, and the other brought by five small businesses, including lead plaintiff V.O.S. Selections Inc., a family-run wine importer, and Terry Precision Cycling LLC, a Burlington, Vermont-based company that specializes in bikes and biking gear for women.
The full text of the ruling is available here.
While the back-and-forth over the president’s tariffs continues, there are many in the jewelry industry who are hopeful that diamonds and colored gemstones will gain an exemption because they cannot be produced in the U.S.
On Wednesday, Jewelers of America President and CEO David Bonaparte said, “Because there are no commercial diamonds found in the U.S., tariffs on diamonds do not protect or potentially grow jobs in the U.S.
“As [U.S. Secretary of Commerce] Howard Lutnick said, the administration will not tax cocoa and mangos because they are not from the U.S. … Diamonds are cocoas and mangos. We agree with the administration and do not want to create a scenario where diamond prices are increased for U.S. consumers.”
De Beers Group CEO Al Cook expressed a similar sentiment in an interview on CNBC this week, telling anchor Manisha Gupta, “Natural diamonds are not found in the United States, and they never will be.
“There are no U.S. diamond mining jobs to protect. So, we believe that the United States will exempt diamonds from tariffs.”
The Latest

The brand is marking its 50th anniversary with a limited-edition bangle, high jewelry suites, new collections, and more.

Goldfarb said changes in the industry, coupled with his age and the updates needed to modernize his business, drove his decision.

Longtime LVMH executive Michael Burke has stepped into the role.

The Seymour & Evelyn Holtzman Bench Scholarship from Jewelers of America returns for a second year.

Central topics of next week’s event include climate action, labor rights, artisan preservation, and value retention in producing countries.


Vickie Rokkos has joined the jewelry company as its new national sales director of North America.

Turbulence will be the new baseline for luxury as it faces its biggest potential setbacks in 15 years, a recent report said.

The countdown is on for the JCK Las Vegas Show and JA is pulling out all the stops.

Sponsored by Rio Grande Jewelry Supply

The “For the Love of Fruits” collection features five fruit pendants, each holding a different meaning.

Diamonds and crimes (some involving diamonds) top the list of National Jeweler’s most popular stories halfway through the year.

They discovered “The Dash Diamond,” named for their dog, at the Crater of Diamonds State Park earlier this month.

The “Les Pétales” collection imagines roses caught mid-bloom as a tribute to nature’s beauty.

Luxury brands charge thousands for their shoes and handbags. Jewelers pricing diamond products should take note, Peter Smith writes.

Rotenberg was an active member of the American Gem Society and an accomplished appraiser who also worked with therapy dogs at a hospital.

It follows New York-based brand Shahla Karimi Jewelry’s all-women team in “Say Yes to the Dress” meets “The Office”-style episodes.

The announcement comes just as the 90-day freeze on the “reciprocal” tariffs nears its end, giving countries more time to negotiate.

Kellie, who joined the organization in 2019, will remain in his role through the end of 2025.

Police officers apprehended the suspects as they were allegedly attempting to gain entry into another jewelry store.

The program, a collaboration between Julius Klein Diamonds and the Women’s Jewelry Association, is in its second year.

Sponsored by the Gemological Institute of America

The 2025 Australian Open champion is the jewelry brand’s first athlete ambassador.

The West Village jewelry boutique’s new shop-in-shop is the cornerstone of Nordstrom’s revamped jewelry hall.

This past year, the manufacturer said it recorded below-zero emissions per carat of natural diamond.

The brand’s “Golden Strada” statement necklace features round, marquise, and pear diamonds that sparkle like Fourth of July fireworks.

JSA’s Scott Guginsky provided a list of nine security measures jewelers should observe while locking up for the long weekend.

Located on Rodeo Drive, the store’s design was inspired by Hollywood and Los Angeles culture.