The new sweeping slate of tariffs impacts 60 countries, including India, China, Thailand, Hong Kong, and the United Arab Emirates.
What's next for De Beers class-action suit?
After the whirlwind of news that was the last two weeks I feel compelled to circle back around and delve deeper into one of the big headliners: the decision on the De Beers class-action lawsuit. As many of you probably...
After the whirlwind of news that was the last two weeks I feel compelled to circle back around and delve deeper into one of the big headliners: the decision on the De Beers class-action lawsuit.
As many of you probably heard, on July 13 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected the 2006 settlement De Beers reached with diamond buyers who sued the diamond giant based on allegations of price fixing, a violation of U.S. antitrust laws. Under the settlement, De Beers had established a $295 million fund to be distributed to millions of diamond buyers separated into two classes. Under the settlement, direct purchasers--companies that bought directly from De Beers or De Beers' mining competitors-were to share a pot of $22.5 million. Indirect purchasers, a group that includes retailers and consumers, were to divide up the remaining $272.5 million.
The court's latest decision likely leaves those with interest in this case (including interested consumers and retailers) with two main questions: Why was the settlement rejected? And, when will I ever get my money?
I'll attempt to answer these questions below, with input from Howard Bashman, the Pennsylvania attorney who filed the successful objection, and another class attorney in the case, Joe Tabacco of Berman DeVallerio in San Francisco.
Why?
In filing his objection, the point Bashman made--which the Third Circuit Appeals Court in Philadelphia agreed with--is that under antitrust laws in some states, you can only sue if you're the direct purchaser of a product or service.
So, Bashman argued, it was unfair for indirect purchasers from certain states to receive a portion of the settlement, since antitrust recovery is limited to only direct purchasers in the states where they reside. (As a point of note, according to the suit, the states are divided on the issue: about 25 allow indirect purchasers to recover in antitrust suits and 25 don't.)
"In this settlement, everyone got to recover no matter what state you're in," Basman says. "The consequences are people like my client are going to get less."
Bashman represents a single individual in this case, a woman from Texas, one of the states that allows indirect purchasers to sue in antitrust cases. Bashman is based in Willow Grove, Pa.
This is a short, simple explanation of the 75-page ruling in the case, which you can read in its entirety by clicking here.
Look at pages 29-31 for a breakdown
While much has been written and said about the attorneys involved in this case, particularly those for the objectors, I think two points need to be made here. One, like the delay or not, Bashman brought forward a valid point of law or the court never would have agreed with his objection. Two, the court ruling points out that this type of sweeping settlement has never been attempted in an antitrust case before. The lawyers in this case were trying something new that seems to have failed, at least for now.
What happens now?
Bashman said the attorneys in the case have until July 27 to ask the appeals court to reconsider their decision. If they chose not to, or if the appeals court denies the request, it returns to the trial court.
There, any number of things could happen. What Bashman would like to see is a new settlement organized on a state-by-state basis and limited to indirect purchasers who live in states with antitrust laws that allow them to sue, potentially meaning more money for those individuals.
Or, as Gemological Institute of America (GIA) diamond expert Russell Shor speculated in the July 16 GIA Insider e-newsletter, the case could splinter into separate lawsuits.
Will I ever get my money?
It's pretty widely known at this point that while the big diamond guys--the direct purchaser class --could net a substantial sum, the recovery for smaller players isn't going to be as much. But these days, money is money and I don't know many retailers that would turn down a check for any amount, no matter how miniscule.
Tabacco said the appeals court decision could delay the distribution of funds by four to 12 months or longer.
Stay tuned...
The Latest

From coin pendants to diamond shields, these old world-inspired jewels are the perfect accessory for an epic journey.

Our Piece of the Week pairs a checkerboard-cut amethyst with an ivy green silk cord.

Colored gemstones, artisan finishes, mixed metals, and meaningful details are shaping demand in bridal jewelry.

Mildred Marcano Abrams and Yael Reinhold join the podcast to talk community connections, holiday plans, and preserving Reinhold’s legacy.


Production also was up in the first half of 2026 but is expected to “substantially” decrease in H2 as two key mines undergo maintenance.

“Art Deco” fuses ancestral techniques, rare materials, and modern perspectives as a tribute to the optimism and curiosity of the movement.

DCA is preparing the next generation of professionals by supporting workforce development, leadership growth, and career advancement.

The jeweler’s newest store is inside Arkansas’ Saracen Casino Resort.

The watch company will design, manufacture, and distribute Kate Spade New York watches.

The higher tax is set to go into effect in August and will apply to loose polished diamonds as well as precious and base metals jewelry.

The “Enchanted Garden” series features a cherry, lemon, and pear that each hold a little secret inside.

It’s located in Tysons Galleria, an upscale shopping center in the Washington, D.C., metro area.

The show, recently acquired by Rockview Management Group, will be held at New York City’s Javits Center from Aug. 2-4.

Smith offers retailers guidance on creating an environment where natural and lab-grown diamonds can both thrive.

Former Emerald President and CEO Hervé Sedky has transitioned to the role of senior advisor.

The 12-piece capsule collection transforms from brooches to pendants.

A Botswana government official told lawmakers Anglo has selected The Global Diamond Consortium, an entity chaired by Penny, to buy De Beers.

The new tariff, imposed after a Trump administration study, is 25 percent and will stack on top of existing tariffs.

The collection from 2014 has been reinterpreted into high jewelry with its signature triangular-shaped elements.

She will also take on the role of vice president of jewelry for SmartWork Media, a newly created position.

Organizers are looking for presentations on topics like manufacturing, technology and research, bench work, gemstones, and sustainability.

Woodley is seen in the campaign wearing our Piece of the Week, the “Frida” collar featuring 13 pieces of hand-carved Venetian glass.

A WeBuyVintage jewelry expert uncovered how much the flea market find was actually worth.

The founder of natural colored diamond wholesaler Pancis Gems shares stories from his five decades in the industry.

Submissions for the milestone 25th annual Gem Awards will be accepted across three categories from now through July 31.

The diamond mine, which opened nearly 30 years ago in Canada’s Northwest Territories, is expected to shut down by mid-August.






















