The industry veterans join the podcast to discuss diamond marketing, the FTC Jewelry Guides, and lobbying for lower tariffs.
What's next for De Beers class-action suit?
After the whirlwind of news that was the last two weeks I feel compelled to circle back around and delve deeper into one of the big headliners: the decision on the De Beers class-action lawsuit. As many of you probably...
After the whirlwind of news that was the last two weeks I feel compelled to circle back around and delve deeper into one of the big headliners: the decision on the De Beers class-action lawsuit.
As many of you probably heard, on July 13 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected the 2006 settlement De Beers reached with diamond buyers who sued the diamond giant based on allegations of price fixing, a violation of U.S. antitrust laws. Under the settlement, De Beers had established a $295 million fund to be distributed to millions of diamond buyers separated into two classes. Under the settlement, direct purchasers--companies that bought directly from De Beers or De Beers' mining competitors-were to share a pot of $22.5 million. Indirect purchasers, a group that includes retailers and consumers, were to divide up the remaining $272.5 million.
The court's latest decision likely leaves those with interest in this case (including interested consumers and retailers) with two main questions: Why was the settlement rejected? And, when will I ever get my money?
I'll attempt to answer these questions below, with input from Howard Bashman, the Pennsylvania attorney who filed the successful objection, and another class attorney in the case, Joe Tabacco of Berman DeVallerio in San Francisco.
Why?
In filing his objection, the point Bashman made--which the Third Circuit Appeals Court in Philadelphia agreed with--is that under antitrust laws in some states, you can only sue if you're the direct purchaser of a product or service.
So, Bashman argued, it was unfair for indirect purchasers from certain states to receive a portion of the settlement, since antitrust recovery is limited to only direct purchasers in the states where they reside. (As a point of note, according to the suit, the states are divided on the issue: about 25 allow indirect purchasers to recover in antitrust suits and 25 don't.)
"In this settlement, everyone got to recover no matter what state you're in," Basman says. "The consequences are people like my client are going to get less."
Bashman represents a single individual in this case, a woman from Texas, one of the states that allows indirect purchasers to sue in antitrust cases. Bashman is based in Willow Grove, Pa.
This is a short, simple explanation of the 75-page ruling in the case, which you can read in its entirety by clicking here.
Look at pages 29-31 for a breakdown
While much has been written and said about the attorneys involved in this case, particularly those for the objectors, I think two points need to be made here. One, like the delay or not, Bashman brought forward a valid point of law or the court never would have agreed with his objection. Two, the court ruling points out that this type of sweeping settlement has never been attempted in an antitrust case before. The lawyers in this case were trying something new that seems to have failed, at least for now.
What happens now?
Bashman said the attorneys in the case have until July 27 to ask the appeals court to reconsider their decision. If they chose not to, or if the appeals court denies the request, it returns to the trial court.
There, any number of things could happen. What Bashman would like to see is a new settlement organized on a state-by-state basis and limited to indirect purchasers who live in states with antitrust laws that allow them to sue, potentially meaning more money for those individuals.
Or, as Gemological Institute of America (GIA) diamond expert Russell Shor speculated in the July 16 GIA Insider e-newsletter, the case could splinter into separate lawsuits.
Will I ever get my money?
It's pretty widely known at this point that while the big diamond guys--the direct purchaser class --could net a substantial sum, the recovery for smaller players isn't going to be as much. But these days, money is money and I don't know many retailers that would turn down a check for any amount, no matter how miniscule.
Tabacco said the appeals court decision could delay the distribution of funds by four to 12 months or longer.
Stay tuned...
The Latest

Murphy will retire at the end of the year and Alexander, currently the company’s president, will take over at the start of 2027.

The jeweler is encouraging customers who own lookalike rings to come into the store and trade them for credit towards an authentic piece.

Submit your pieces for a chance to win in this year's competition.

The new campaign, “You Are The Occasion,” discourages shoppers from saving their fine jewelry for special occasions only.


Mehta led India’s GJEPC through the 2008 financial crisis and was respected worldwide for his wisdom, integrity, and knowledge.

One is the driver who allegedly crashed a car into a Sacramento jewelry store in April, striking a 71-year-old employee who later died.

Retailers are seeking new ways to attract customers, increase traffic, and create revenue – Estate buying events are a popular solution.

In a new column, Peter Smith posits that people actually enjoy putting together IKEA furniture, and the same is true for engagement rings.

9lakha Jewelers in Iselin, New Jersey, was the target of a smash-and-grab robbery on Aug. 8.

The jeweler has partnered with 818 Tequila to gift lab-grown diamond studs to a bride-to-be and their bridal party.

The exhibition will feature more than 100 drawings of stained-glass lampshades, windows, and more, many created by women and émigrés.

Marquise-cut diamonds in drop charms are the center of the new collection, reflecting the movement of a dancer in modular styles.

The inaugural Fort Lauderdale Jewelry, Antique, & Object Show will be held from Jan. 28 through Feb. 1, 2027.

The family-owned jeweler will open a new showroom in Bel Air, Maryland, this fall.

Amanda Ileana Hernandez is married to Carlos Hernandez, one of two men in prison for the 2024 murder of Michigan jeweler Hussein Murray.

The reimagined jewel, our Piece of the Week, trades the diamonds in the original 1998 design for blue, pink, yellow, and green sapphires.

Sponsored by American Gem Trade Association

In the United States, second-quarter sales were flat amid soft consumer sentiment and lower in-store traffic.

The 22-karat gold egg, sold at Batemans Auctioneers in the U.K., was part of a 1980s treasure hunt ad campaign for Cadbury Creme Eggs.

Lucara Diamond Corp., which recovered the “Motswedi” diamond from the Karowe mine, sold the stone for an undisclosed amount.

The expanded collections now feature hand-cut gemstones like topaz, tanzanite, chrysoprase, chalcedony, smoky quartz, and fire opal.

The lab-grown diamond jewelry brand’s newest boutique is in Westfield Valley Fair in Santa Clara, California.

The gemstone supplier and manufacturer acquired the remarkable 104-gram Zambian emerald at Gemfields’ auction in May.

Two suspects offered to trade the woman a “winning” lottery ticket for her jewelry.

Finsch has been in business rescue since May, and owner Petra Diamonds said it sees no viable path forward for the mine.

Michel Patrick DeSalles was sentenced after pleading guilty to the 2017 murder of Omid Gholian, who owned a jewelry store in Manhattan.























