He retired last month after 28 years traveling the world to source the very best gemstones for his family’s jewelry business, Oscar Heyman.
What's next for De Beers class-action suit?
After the whirlwind of news that was the last two weeks I feel compelled to circle back around and delve deeper into one of the big headliners: the decision on the De Beers class-action lawsuit. As many of you probably...
After the whirlwind of news that was the last two weeks I feel compelled to circle back around and delve deeper into one of the big headliners: the decision on the De Beers class-action lawsuit.
As many of you probably heard, on July 13 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected the 2006 settlement De Beers reached with diamond buyers who sued the diamond giant based on allegations of price fixing, a violation of U.S. antitrust laws. Under the settlement, De Beers had established a $295 million fund to be distributed to millions of diamond buyers separated into two classes. Under the settlement, direct purchasers--companies that bought directly from De Beers or De Beers' mining competitors-were to share a pot of $22.5 million. Indirect purchasers, a group that includes retailers and consumers, were to divide up the remaining $272.5 million.
The court's latest decision likely leaves those with interest in this case (including interested consumers and retailers) with two main questions: Why was the settlement rejected? And, when will I ever get my money?
I'll attempt to answer these questions below, with input from Howard Bashman, the Pennsylvania attorney who filed the successful objection, and another class attorney in the case, Joe Tabacco of Berman DeVallerio in San Francisco.
Why?
In filing his objection, the point Bashman made--which the Third Circuit Appeals Court in Philadelphia agreed with--is that under antitrust laws in some states, you can only sue if you're the direct purchaser of a product or service.
So, Bashman argued, it was unfair for indirect purchasers from certain states to receive a portion of the settlement, since antitrust recovery is limited to only direct purchasers in the states where they reside. (As a point of note, according to the suit, the states are divided on the issue: about 25 allow indirect purchasers to recover in antitrust suits and 25 don't.)
"In this settlement, everyone got to recover no matter what state you're in," Basman says. "The consequences are people like my client are going to get less."
Bashman represents a single individual in this case, a woman from Texas, one of the states that allows indirect purchasers to sue in antitrust cases. Bashman is based in Willow Grove, Pa.
This is a short, simple explanation of the 75-page ruling in the case, which you can read in its entirety by clicking here.
Look at pages 29-31 for a breakdown
While much has been written and said about the attorneys involved in this case, particularly those for the objectors, I think two points need to be made here. One, like the delay or not, Bashman brought forward a valid point of law or the court never would have agreed with his objection. Two, the court ruling points out that this type of sweeping settlement has never been attempted in an antitrust case before. The lawyers in this case were trying something new that seems to have failed, at least for now.
What happens now?
Bashman said the attorneys in the case have until July 27 to ask the appeals court to reconsider their decision. If they chose not to, or if the appeals court denies the request, it returns to the trial court.
There, any number of things could happen. What Bashman would like to see is a new settlement organized on a state-by-state basis and limited to indirect purchasers who live in states with antitrust laws that allow them to sue, potentially meaning more money for those individuals.
Or, as Gemological Institute of America (GIA) diamond expert Russell Shor speculated in the July 16 GIA Insider e-newsletter, the case could splinter into separate lawsuits.
Will I ever get my money?
It's pretty widely known at this point that while the big diamond guys--the direct purchaser class --could net a substantial sum, the recovery for smaller players isn't going to be as much. But these days, money is money and I don't know many retailers that would turn down a check for any amount, no matter how miniscule.
Tabacco said the appeals court decision could delay the distribution of funds by four to 12 months or longer.
Stay tuned...
The Latest

The charm necklace features six nautical charms of shells and coral that founder Christina Puchi collected on Florida’s beaches.

The organization elected its youngest vice president as it looks to draw in fresh talent.

The Seymour & Evelyn Holtzman Bench Scholarship from Jewelers of America returns for a second year.

Campbell joins the company as vice president of business development while Liebler is the new vice president of operations.


The medals feature a split-texture design highlighting the Games’ first time being hosted by two cities and the athletes’ journeys.

Sponsored by The INSTORE Jewelry Show 2025

The countdown is on for the JCK Las Vegas Show and JA is pulling out all the stops.

Globally, travel and transportation brands reigned, while in the U.S., alcoholic beverage companies and a lingerie brand took the top spots.

The Brooklyn-based jewelry designer is remembered as a true artist and a rare talent.

Production at the mine in Canada’s Northwest Territories topped 1 million carats in Q2, the third consecutive quarter of growth.

A new slate of Learning Workshops will take place in Oklahoma, Mississippi, and Georgia.

The middle class is changing its approach to buying jewelry and affordable luxury goods, the NRF said.

It marks the third consecutive quarter of growth for Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels, Buccellati, and Vhernier.

The reseller’s market trends report, based on its sales data, also shows exactly how much Rolex prices have jumped since 2010.

The auction house will be hosting a retrospective paying tribute to jeweler Jean Dinh Van and his company’s 60th anniversary.

Jake Duneier and Danielle Duneier-Goldberg have stepped into the roles of CEO and president, respectively.

The “Impermanence” collection contemplates nature through the Japanese art of Ikebana (flower arranging) and philosophy of wabi-sabi.

The Texas-based jewelry retailer has set up shop in Tennessee and Arizona.

Eric Ford will step into the role, bringing with him decades of experience.

In addition to improved capabilities, the acquisition will allow the jeweler to offer support to other independent jewelers.

The “Celestial Blue” capsule collection campaign features Olympian Kateryna Sadurska.

The seasonal store, located in Mykonos, Greece, offers exclusive events, personal styling, and curated experiences.

The New England jeweler is hosting a bridal event for the month of August.

The trade-only event will host its debut fair in the Emerald City later this month.

Its sessions will focus on inventory strategies, staff performance, retention and acquisition, emerging market trends, and more.

For its 10th anniversary, Miseno designed the “Arco” earrings based on the Arco Felice, an arch conceptualized in A.D. 95 in Miseno, Italy.