MajorsOct 29, 2020
LVMH Snags Tiffany at Lower PriceMajorsMar 24, 2021
The Tiffany v. Costco Battle Wages On
Now returned to a lower court, the jeweler and the big-box retailer are locking horns over damages and Tiffany’s right to a jury trial.
Tiffany and Costco’s fight over the term “Tiffany Setting” continues, with the two battling it out over punitive damages and a jury trial. (Photo ® Tiffany & Co.)
New York—The battle wages on between Tiffany and Costco in what is a formative case for the jewelry industry regarding the use of the term “Tiffany setting.”
Tiffany & Co. first took Costco Wholesale Corp. to court in 2013, suing the big-box retailer in New York federal court for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair business practices for selling rings in its stores labeled as “Tiffany” that were not made by Tiffany.
Costco filed a countersuit, claiming the term “Tiffany setting” had become genericized and could be used by any company to describe a ring with multiple, slender prongs holding a single stone. It asked the court to invalidate any federal trademark registrations that would prevent other retailers from using the term “Tiffany setting.”
A federal judge ruled in Tiffany’s favor in 2015, granting the jeweler’s motion for summary judgment (a judgment entered by the court without a full trial) in the case.
A jury decided on damages, ordering Costco to pay Tiffany $5.5 million for unlawful profits ($3.7 million in direct profits and $1.8 million for additional benefits derived from the ring sales) and $8.25 million in punitive damages.
The judge trebled the $3.7 million to $11 million, bringing the total amount Costco was to pay Tiffany to $21 million.
Last August, however, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the summary judgment on appeal from Costco.
The judges ruled unanimously that if a jury had heard the case, “reasonable” jurors could find Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” wasn’t likely to confuse customers or make them think Tiffany had produced or endorsed the rings.
The appeals court sent the case back to the district court, where Tiffany and Costco are now at odds over punitive damages and the issue of a jury.
Related stories will be right here …
Tiffany & Co. first took Costco Wholesale Corp. to court in 2013, suing the big-box retailer in New York federal court for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair business practices for selling rings in its stores labeled as “Tiffany” that were not made by Tiffany.
Costco filed a countersuit, claiming the term “Tiffany setting” had become genericized and could be used by any company to describe a ring with multiple, slender prongs holding a single stone. It asked the court to invalidate any federal trademark registrations that would prevent other retailers from using the term “Tiffany setting.”
A federal judge ruled in Tiffany’s favor in 2015, granting the jeweler’s motion for summary judgment (a judgment entered by the court without a full trial) in the case.
A jury decided on damages, ordering Costco to pay Tiffany $5.5 million for unlawful profits ($3.7 million in direct profits and $1.8 million for additional benefits derived from the ring sales) and $8.25 million in punitive damages.
The judge trebled the $3.7 million to $11 million, bringing the total amount Costco was to pay Tiffany to $21 million.
Last August, however, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the summary judgment on appeal from Costco.
The judges ruled unanimously that if a jury had heard the case, “reasonable” jurors could find Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” wasn’t likely to confuse customers or make them think Tiffany had produced or endorsed the rings.
The appeals court sent the case back to the district court, where Tiffany and Costco are now at odds over punitive damages and the issue of a jury.
On Feb. 12, Costco filed a motion in limine seeking to prevent a jury trial in the case and blocking Tiffany from seeking punitive damages on grounds the jeweler needs to prove lost profits (which it is not seeking in the case) before it can ask for punitive damages.
Tiffany fired back earlier this month, arguing the district court has ruled multiple times—a total of six before this, in fact—that punitive damages are available to it under New York law and that “nothing material” has changed about the case since those prior rulings.
The court also previously determined that Tiffany is entitled to a jury and, the jeweler argued in its March 12 memo opposing the motion, one is needed to determine damages in the case.
The now LVMH-owned jeweler also pointed out Costco itself asked for the case to be presented to a jury when it filed its appeal.
Tiffany fired back earlier this month, arguing the district court has ruled multiple times—a total of six before this, in fact—that punitive damages are available to it under New York law and that “nothing material” has changed about the case since those prior rulings.
The court also previously determined that Tiffany is entitled to a jury and, the jeweler argued in its March 12 memo opposing the motion, one is needed to determine damages in the case.
The now LVMH-owned jeweler also pointed out Costco itself asked for the case to be presented to a jury when it filed its appeal.
When, or if, another trial might take place remains unclear.
According to a joint status report filed March 12, Tiffany will not consent to a virtual trial, but said it could be ready for an in-person trial by July, if one can be held safely by then.
Court papers also indicate a settlement is not out of the question.
The two parties had a settlement discussion prior to the case going to trial in 2016 and have had additional discussions since the ruling on the appeal. Those discussions are continuing.
Tiffany v. Costco is filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
According to a joint status report filed March 12, Tiffany will not consent to a virtual trial, but said it could be ready for an in-person trial by July, if one can be held safely by then.
Court papers also indicate a settlement is not out of the question.
The two parties had a settlement discussion prior to the case going to trial in 2016 and have had additional discussions since the ruling on the appeal. Those discussions are continuing.
Tiffany v. Costco is filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
More on Majors
The Latest
Events & AwardsAug 04, 2025
Gem Awards, David Yurman Introduce $50K Grant for Emerging DesignersThe winner of the inaugural David Yurman Gem Awards Grant will be announced live at the 2026 Gem Awards gala.
TrendsAug 04, 2025
Amanda’s Style File: August’s Bright BaublesAs summer winds down, celebrate the sunny disposition of the month’s birthstones: peridot and spinel.
CrimeAug 04, 2025
‘The Watch King’ Assaulted, Robbed in QueensMoshe Haimoff, a social media personality and 47th Street retailer, was robbed of $559,000 worth of jewelry by men in construction outfits.
Brought to you by
Taking the Moment Head On: How Rio Grande Champions the Present & Future of Fine JewelryAs a leading global jewelry supplier, Rio Grande is rapidly expanding and developing new solutions to meet the needs of jewelers worldwide.
MajorsAug 01, 2025
Jewelers Mutual Names Mike Alexander as President The insurance company’s previous president and CEO, Scott Murphy, has split his role and will continue as CEO.
Weekly QuizJul 31, 2025
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
SourcingAug 01, 2025
Gemfields’ Auction Revenue Drops 50% in H1The nearly six-month pause of operations at its Kagem emerald mine earlier this year impacted the miner’s first-half results.
CollectionsAug 01, 2025
Piece of the Week: Hernsdorf’s ‘Tears of Aphrodite’ NecklaceThe necklace uses spinel drops to immortalize the moment Aphrodite’s tears mixed with her lover Adonis’ blood after he was fatally wounded.
Brought to you by
Investing in the Next Generation of Bench JewelersThe Seymour & Evelyn Holtzman Bench Scholarship from Jewelers of America returns for a second year.
SourcingJul 31, 2025
De Beers Records $189M First-Half Loss The diamond miner and marketer warned last week that it expected to be in the red after significantly cutting prices in Q2.
Events & AwardsJul 31, 2025
These Are the 2025 CASE Award WinnersJewelers of America’s 35th annual design contest recognized creativity, artistry, style, and excellence.
IndependentsJul 31, 2025
Matthew Tratner Takes Over as CBG President Tratner succeeds Andie Weinman, who will begin stepping back from the buying group’s day-to-day operations.
Policies & IssuesJul 30, 2025
Tariff on India Will Be 25%, Trump Says The president made the announcement via Truth Social Wednesday, adding that India also will face a penalty for its dealings with Russia.
FinancialsJul 30, 2025
Kering's Jewelry Brands Resilient As H1 Sales Slide 16%The luxury titan’s star brand Gucci continued to struggle amid a "tough" environment.
WatchesJul 30, 2025
Peek Inside Zadok Jewelers’ New Rolex Showroom in AustinIts opening marks the completion of the retailer’s new 11,000-square-foot store in the Texas capital.
SurveysJul 30, 2025
Consumer Confidence Ticks Up in JulyRespondents shared concerns about tariffs and commentary on the “Big Beautiful Bill.”
SourcingJul 30, 2025
Rob Bates to Release Latest Book in His ‘Diamond District Mystery’ Series“Making a Killing in Diamonds” tells the story of Mimi Rosen, the disappearance of a scientist, and the murder of lab-grown diamond CEO.
EditorsJul 29, 2025
Out & About: Visiting Tacori’s Design Studio in LASenior Editor Lenore Fedow learned a lot when she took a behind-the-scenes factory tour with the jewelry brand earlier this year.
Events & AwardsJul 29, 2025
Melee The Show Welcomes 15 New DesignersThe first-time exhibitors, set to debut at the New York City show, share a devotion to craftsmanship, storytelling, and material integrity.
SourcingJul 29, 2025
Auctim to Offer 7.3M+ Carats of Rough EmeraldsThe online auction house’s September sale will feature rough Brazilian emeralds of various qualities.
MajorsJul 29, 2025
Alexis Padis Re-Elected AGS Board President She’ll lead an executive committee consisting of President-Elect Bryan Moeller, Mitchell Clark, Bill Farmer, and Larry Rickert.
Policies & IssuesJul 28, 2025
U.S.-EU Come to Agreement on Tariffs Announced Sunday, the deal will set the tax on goods imported into the United States from the European Union at 15 percent.
CollectionsJul 28, 2025
Nanis Brings a New Palette to ‘Ipanema’A new edition of the Italian brand’s “Ipanema” collection has debuted with gemstones that evoke Brazil’s breathtaking views.
MajorsJul 28, 2025
The 1916 Company Partners with ‘Shark Tank’ Star’s Watch Insurance PlatformThe retailer will refer its customers to WonderCare, founded by venture capitalist and watch collector Kevin O’Leary.
IndependentsJul 28, 2025
Sissy’s Log Cabin to Open Flagship in Arkansas The jeweler’s largest store yet is set to open in Little Rock next fall.
CollectionsJul 25, 2025
Piece of the Week: Jemma Wynne’s ‘Forme’ NecklaceAnne Hathaway was seen wearing the toggle necklace three times while filming scenes for “The Devil Wears Prada 2.”
Events & AwardsJul 25, 2025
Pre-Registration Open for September Hong Kong ShowJewellery & Gem World Hong Kong is scheduled for Sept. 15 to 21, and buyer pre-registration will be available until Sept. 7.
FinancialsJul 25, 2025
LVMH Sales Slip in H1 Amid ‘Prevailing Uncertainties’Renovations at Tiffany & Co. stores ate into profits in the company’s watch and jewelry division.
