Sherry Smith shares data on the year gone by, including the breakdown between natural and lab-grown diamond sales.
Gender bias case against Sterling moves forward
An arbitrator has issued a mixed ruling in the ongoing gender discrimination case against Kay and Jared parent company Sterling Jewelers.
New York--An arbitrator ruled this week that a group of women can pursue claims challenging Sterling Jeweler Inc.’s pay and promotion practices as a class though she threw out claims that the alleged discrimination was intentional.
In a 118-page decision released Tuesday, arbitrator Kathleen A. Roberts ruled that the 12 claimants could proceed as a class in arbitration to determine if the Akron, Ohio-based retailer’s compensation and promotion practices have a “disparate impact on women.” Sterling has fought for years against having the case certified as a class.
If disparities are found for which there is no justifiable business reason, then the women will be eligible as a class to affect changes in Sterling’s practices and will be able to pursue claims for lost wages individually.
In terms of alleged pay discrimination specifically, the class covers women who worked at Sterling between July 22, 2004 and the yet-to-be-set date of the trial, which will take place before the same arbitrator. In terms of alleged promotion discrimination, it covers women who worked at Sterling between Dec. 7, 2004 and the trial date.
What the arbitrator denied were the women’s claims of disparate treatment, meaning that the discrimination was intentional and part of an overall corporate culture that demeaned female employees.
In denying the women’s claims of disparate treatment, the arbitrator stated in her ruling that the claimants failed to provide the “significant proof” necessary to pursue claims of intentional discrimination.
This burden of significant proof Roberts relied upon in this case was the one set in the Wal-Mart gender discrimination case, though she noted that the Wal-Mart decision is one that presents “substantial hurdles” for pursuing claims of intentional discrimination as a large class.
The arbitrator wrote, “While the evidence in [the Sterling] case”--a case that includes particularly salacious claims that women were groped and grabbed, solicited for sex and expected to undress publicly at often-mandatory company events, as well as internal company memos acknowledging that the company paid women less than men--“may be in some respects stronger than the evidence presented in Wal-Mart, it fails to provide significant proof that Sterling operated under a general policy of discrimination.”
Roberts called into question specifically the opinion of one expert for the claimants, James Outtz, stating that he cannot answer the “essential question” of what percentage of the employment decisions at Sterling are determined by a “gender-discriminatory
She also stated that Outtz’s conclusions are not supported by reliable methodology. Among other things, he disregarded about 600 declarations written by the company’s female employees that reflect a very different view of the company’s treatment of women. “His decision to disregard this evidence, without any explanation, at a minimum calls his objectivity into question,” Roberts noted in her ruling.
Both sides are claiming the arbitrator’s ruling as a victory.
Joe Sellers, an attorney representing the women, said it was an “enormous achievement” for his clients and a “very important case” that gives them the opportunity to affect broad changes in a company that’s a leader in its industry.
Sterling, meanwhile, called the ruling “favorable,” pointing to the fact that the arbitrator rejected claims that Sterling had “systematically and intentionally” discriminated against female employees.
Regarding the portion of the arbitration that Roberts did allow to move forward, company spokesman David Bouffard said, “Sterling is optimistic that it will be able to demonstrate that the case is without either factual or legal merit in the next phase of the proceedings. We will continue to vigorously defend ourselves.”
The Latest
The company also is matching donations made to Jewelers of America and the Diamond Council of America’s Jewelers Relief Fund.
Now in its fourth year, the program is expanding to include a list of “20 Under 40” for jewelry suppliers.
The new year feels like a clean slate, inspiring reflection, hope, and the motivation to become better versions of ourselves.
Core retail sales during the 2024 holiday season surpassed the National Retail Federation’s forecast.
The “Reach for Life” collection uses feather and arrow motifs to invite growth and inner curiosity.
Peter Smith pulls back the curtain on the often misinterpreted, and sometimes maligned, world of sales training.
A Diamond is Forever hosted a holiday celebration in honor of their new marketing campaign, ‘Forever Present.’
Pantone’s 2025 Color of the Year takes the form of jewelry through gemstones and enamel that look just as delicious as mocha mousse.
From raffles to auctions to donations, the industry is working to aid charities in Los Angeles amid the raging wildfires.
Julia Hackman Chafé and Monica Elias have joined the organization’s board of directors.
The company, which owns Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, had a record Q3, with sales topping $6 billion.
The necklace features a sapphire drop weighing more than 9 carats that detaches to transform into a ring.
The 127-year-old jeweler is planning to open a new store in Mystic, Connecticut.
The watches’ dials feature artwork celebrating the vibrant energy and unique landscapes of six of America’s national parks.
Offered by U.K. auction house Woolley & Wallis, the yellow diamond bracelet was a gift from Taylor’s good friend Michael Jackson.
The jewelry trade show returns to The Venetian Expo and The Venetian Resort in Las Vegas from June 6 to 9.
Associate Editor Natalie Francisco highlights her favorite fashion jewelry pieces from the upcoming “Unapologetically Iris” auction.
The online guide is available for free and written with the jewelry industry in mind.
The awards honor the late Jose Hess, a founding member of AJDC and an award-winning jewelry designer.
The grading lab said the search for her successor is underway.
In this special op-ed, designer Jules Kim calls on big brands to collaborate with independent creators instead of copying their designs.
A pioneering figure in gemology, he is remembered for his spirit of generosity, curiosity, and joy.
The peak selling days leading up to Christmas did not meet the jewelry retailer’s expectations.
Schneider brings over 20 years of luxury and fashion industry experience to his role as a key member of the brand’s global leadership team.
Gemfields said the Zambian government revoked the 2019 suspension of the tax with no warning.
With versions in 18-karat gold and platinum, the wearables company is blending health technology and fine jewelry.