Jamie Dunton and Gabriella Botelho are the first graduates of the program, created by the WJA Foundation and Julius Klein Diamonds.
Judge Denies Signet’s Motion in Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Signet Jewelers sought to have one of the two claims brought against it by shareholders in a 2016 suit dismissed.
New York—Earlier this month, a New York federal judge denied Signet Jewelers Ltd.’s request to dismiss one of the two claims contained in a lawsuit brought against it by shareholders.
The Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, a pension fund, is the lead plaintiff in a purported securities class-action against Signet originally filed in 2016.
The lawsuit accuses the jewelry retailer of misrepresenting two aspects of the company: the health of its credit portfolio (which the company has since outsourced) and allegations of a culture of “pervasive” sexual harassment.
The sexual harassment aspect of the shareholder lawsuit relates to Jock, et al. v. Sterling Jewelers Inc., a subsidiary of Signet. That case was filed in March 2008 by several women accusing the company of discriminatory pay and promotion practices based on their gender.
Though the case itself contains no allegations of sexual harassment, documents eventually unsealed in connection to the case, and reported on by The Washington Post as well as other media outlets, painted a picture of a culture where women were objectified, disrespected and scared of retaliation, generating a lot of negative publicity for the retailer and, the shareholders noted in their lawsuit, sending Signet’s stock price plummeting.
Signet previously sought to have the entire shareholder lawsuit dismissed, but U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon denied that motion in November 2018.
In May 2019, the retailer sought the dismissal of the claims relating to its company culture. It filed a motion for a judgement on the pleadings, which is when a party asks the court to rule in its favor based not on new evidence but interpretation of the law.
Signet asked the court to take a look at a March ruling from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case called Singh v. Cigna Corp.
In that case, a shareholder alleged that Cigna’s pamphlet about its code of ethics misled investors about its compliance with Medicare regulations, court documents show.
The code of ethics, which included statements about staying in compliance with the law and acting with integrity, was determined to be a “textbook example of puffery,” court papers state, meaning the statements were too general for a reasonable investor to take into consideration when buying shares of the company.
Signet argued in its motion for a judgement on the pleadings that its code of conduct should be viewed in the same manner, but Judge McMahon disagreed and
In her ruling, the judge wrote that statements included in a company’s code of conduct can be specific enough for investors to rely upon when deciding to invest in a company.
The judge also noted that the Singh v. Cigna decision did not mean that all company codes of conduct were now “inactionable” and highlighted the importance of context.
McMahon summarized the plaintiff’s argument, stating: “In the face of a credible accusation (by way of another lawsuit) that Signet suffered from rampant sexual harassment … defendants sought to reassure the investing public that Signet did not, in fact, have a toxic workplace.”
The judge pointed to examples of Signet’s public reassurances, including its denial of the allegations in its SEC filings; its affirmations that hiring decisions were made based on merit, that misconduct would be disciplined, and that sexual harassment could be reported without fear of retaliation; and its assurance that its senior executives were held to high standards.
“As alleged, a reasonable investor—who otherwise would be concerned about how grave allegations concerning rampant sexual misconduct might affect her investment in Signet—took defendants at their word,” McMahon wrote. “As alleged, their word was not truthful.”
Signet’s attorneys requested last Tuesday that the judge reconsider due to alleged factual errors, including errors about when the code of conduct was published in relation to the Jock case.
McMahon denied that motion Thursday, stating that the court did not rely on factual inaccuracies or mischaracterizations.
“The problem for defendants is that …. Signet’s codes of conduct and ethics—again, reincorporated by reference in Signet’s SEC filings and posted on Signet’s website after Jock was filed—touted certain values and practices that constitute the exact opposite of what the company allegedly valued and practiced,” she wrote.
The securities fraud case against Signet is still in pre-trial proceedings and the court has not officially certified it as a class action.
Signet Jewelers declined to comment on the judge’s ruling, saying it does not comment on pending legal matters.
The investors’ counsel did not respond to request for comment.
The Latest
In the spirit of giving, Retrouvaí will donate $4,000 from the sale of this ring to the Los Angeles Regional Food Bank.
Co-owner Dan DeVries shared what it’s like moving into a space triple the size of its old store and how it feels to be a “real jeweler” now.
A Diamond is Forever hosted a holiday celebration in honor of their new marketing campaign, ‘Forever Present.’
Along with the latest “Gardens” collection, the brand has released limited-edition designs offering more indulgent pieces.
The man and woman are accused of stealing jewelry from a shipping container then trying to flee by paddling a small boat out into a bay.
The 2,488-carat diamond recovered from a mine in Botswana has been dubbed “Motswedi” while its 1,094-carat sibling is “Seriti.”
‘Forever Present’ campaign revives the iconic A Diamond is Forever tagline and celebrates the diamond dream.
The average price per carat hit a record high for the miner, which said it remains unaffected by the conflict in Mozambique.
The nearly 17-carat stone made history for the color-change gem that, according to the auction house, is experiencing a “notable surge” in the market.
More than a century after survivors gifted a Tiffany timepiece to the captain of the ship that rescued them, the jeweler has reclaimed it.
The videos highlight how pieces from the “Xpandable” and “Reversible Xpandable” collections put the wearer in the spotlight.
Feldman reflected on 45 years in the jewelry industry and clarified that it’s not a total retirement.
The luxury brand is being honored for excellence in high jewelry design in its “Haute Joaillerie Sport” collection.
Circelli was a pioneer in the world of TV shopping who is remembered for his passion for gemstones and his big personality.
The nearly 6-carat stone headlined the recent jewelry auction, which also featured Mica Ertegun’s jewelry.
The three men, who got their nickname because they’d toss the jewelry they stole into black plastic bins, were arrested back in August.
“The History of Diamond Engagement Rings: A True Romance” is a 128-page small-format book containing more than 165 images.
Gearys opened a 6,200-square-foot Rolex store with a design that pays homage to the brand’s connection to the ocean.
The diamond cut grade is now available for marquise- and pear-shaped diamonds.
DDG said the honorees’ business practices embody a commitment to positive social impact, industry innovation, and community empowerment.
Estimates on the size and value of the solitaire diamond, which is mounted on a diamond pavé-set yellow gold band, vary.
These half-moon tanzanite earrings totaling 25 carats are part of a special trunk show taking place this weekend in Dallas.
The National Jeweler editors recap the top news, the best jewels, and their favorite stories of the year.
The highest-grossing lot of the sale was the retired QB’s Rolex Paul Newman Daytona “John Player Special.”
Recent expansion initiatives at the Zambian emerald mine have shown strong production numbers, said Grizzly founder Abdoulaye Ndiaye.
The competition awarded 12 designers, each from a country where De Beers recovers diamonds, with business support and tuition assistance.