These punk-inspired earrings from the new Canadian brand’s debut collection reveal the alter ego of the classic pearl.
South Dakota, Online Sales Tax and the Supreme Court
Last week, South Dakota’s highest court shot down Senate Bill 106. Here’s why it matters in the ongoing fight over internet tax.
Unless you’re one of the 800,000-plus residents of South Dakota, it’s unlikely you’ve heard much about Senate Bill 106.
Introduced in the state legislature by a bipartisan group of seven senators and eight representatives last year, S.B. 106 mandates that companies that make more than $100,000 in sales or have more than 200 transactions per calendar year in South Dakota remit sales tax, whether they have a physical presence in the state or not.
In introducing the bill, legislators argued that, first, the state needs the revenue it’s missing from online sales and, second, that the current law of the land, so to speak--Quill Corp. v. North Dakota--needs to be re-evaluated.
Quill is the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1992 that prevents states from collecting sales tax from sellers with no physical presence in the state; the overarching argument of internet tax proponents everywhere is that this 25-year-old law is now wildly outdated given how consumers shop today.
S.B. 106 passed both houses with little opposition and South Dakota’s Republican governor, Dennis Daugaard, signed it into law in March 2016.
It wasn’t long after the bill’s passage that three online retailers, Overstock.com Inc., WayFair Inc. and NewEgg Inc., pushed back and the case wound its way through South Dakota’s legal system, landing with the state Supreme Court in short order.
Salt Lake City-based Overstock.com sells a variety of merchandise, including fine jewelry, ranking among the $100 Million Supersellers in the 2016 State of the Majors report and, spoiler alert, in the soon-to-be-published 2017 edition as well.
WayFair, meanwhile, is a Boston-based online seller of furniture and home décor, and City of Industry, California-headquartered NewEgg is an electronics retailer.
In a ruling issued last Wednesday authored by Chief Justice David Gilbertson, the court sided with the e-tailers, stating that: “However persuasive the state’s arguments on the merits of revisiting the issue, Quill has not been overruled. Quill remains the controlling precedent on the issue of Commerce Clause limitations on interstate collection of sales and use taxes.”
Despite the court’s siding with the internet sellers, Chris Fetzer of Haake Fetzer, the firm that lobbies for Jewelers of America on behalf of the industry in Washington, said that the authors of the bill do not view the ruling as a failure.
It is, in fact, exactly what they wanted.
“It was fully expected that it (S.B. 106) would be challenged as illegal. This law was written to be challenged within
What has compelled them is a recent statement from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy in the DMA vs. Brohl case, which reads in part: “[T]he internet has caused far-reaching systemic and structural changes in the economy” so that “a business may be present in a state in a meaningful way without that presence being physical in the traditional sense of the word.”
He said that it is “unwise [for the U.S. Supreme Court] to delay any longer a reconsideration of the court’s holding in Quill.”
I reached out to Overstock.com, the lone jewelry retailer out of the three, for comment on the ruling and Kennedy’s comments late Monday afternoon.
The company was not able to respond by press time, but board Chairman Jonathan Johnson told Bloomberg that proponents of online sales tax are putting too much emphasis on that statement from Kennedy and have no assurances that the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the case or, if it does, rule in their favor and overturn Quill.
I think the statement from Justice Kennedy is pretty clear, but Johnson is right about one thing: There is no guarantee that the Supreme Court will decide to hear the case, though the chances increase if more states get involved.
Fetzer said typically, what most attracts the Supreme Court to take up a case is a “circuit split,” when multiple federal appeals courts have ruled in conflict on a given issue.
That is not at play in this instance, but what also can be attractive is when there’s an issue that multiple states are concerned about, which could happen here as more states could join South Dakota in petitioning the Supreme Court to review Quill.
Johnson also is right about another thing: There is no guarantee the court will rule to overturn Quill even if it does take up the case.
But, Fetzer points out, Kennedy’s comments indicate that he would be in favor of changing Quill and the court’s newest justice, Neil Gorsuch, also has expressed his support for the arguments that have long been put forth by internet sales tax proponents.
The court’s next term commences in October, so there’s a chance it could revisit the Quill decision between next month and June 2018.
We’ll keep you posted.
The Latest
The company brings its nanotechnology to two new fancy cuts for diamonds that feature its signature color and brilliance.
Sponsored by Tasha R
From protecting customer data to safeguarding inventory records, it's crucial to learn how to tackle cybersecurity challenges.
Three Titanic survivors presented him with the personalized Tiffany & Co. timepiece about a year after the tragedy.
A federal court found that the jewelry store chain violated terms of the settlement reached after it was accused of defrauding customers.
Cynthia Erivo chose Dreams of Hope, an organization dedicated to empowering LGBTQA+ youth, as the charity for this year’s collection.
This fall, sharpen your skills in jewelry grading, quality control and diamond assessment.
The new space was designed to evoke a warm, inviting vibe.
Kinney, who spent nearly 30 years at IJO, has been hired to head Abbott Jewelry Systems’ new virtual marketplace.
The auction house was accused of helping clients avoid paying taxes on millions of dollars’ worth of art purchased from 2010 to 2020.
The four finalists will present their pieces at the 2025 JCK Las Vegas show.
The “Camera Oscura” collection showcases earring designs celebrating female Surrealist artists Claude Cahun and Leonor Fini.
The money will fund the planting of 10,000 trees in critical areas across Oregon, Arizona, Montana, and other regions.
The event centered on advancing jewelry manufacturing technology will return to Detroit in May 2025.
Local reports identified the woman as the wife of the jewelry store owner.
A collection of pieces owned by Ferdinand I, the first king of modern Bulgaria, and his family, blew away estimates in Geneva last week.
The Australian jewelry box brand’s new West Village store will showcase new jewelers each month through its Designer in Residence program.
“Lovechild” was created in partnership with Carolyn Rafaelian’s Metal Alchemist brand.
The group will host several curated events and an exhibition of designer jewelry made with Peruvian gold traceable to the miners’ names.
The collection honors the 50th anniversary of Dolly Parton’s “Love is Like a Butterfly” song, which shares a birth year with Kendra Scott.
This year’s theme asks designers to take inspiration from classic fairy tales.
Senior Editor Lenore Fedow makes the case for why more jewelers should be appealing to nerds at the annual event.
The latest “Raiz’in” drop showcases a newly designed “Scapular” necklace and donates a portion of the proceeds to Make-A-Wish France.
No. 1 out of 100, the timepiece was created to mark Citizen’s 100th anniversary and will be auctioned off at Sotheby’s next month.
On the latest episode of “My Next Question,” two experts share best practices for store security during the holidays and year-round.
Sotheby’s sold the necklace, which potentially has ties to Marie-Antoinette, for $4.8 million to a woman bidding via phone.