Sponsored by the Gemological Institute of America
‘Taj Mahal’ Pendant Back at the Center of Dispute
The estate of the late Elizabeth Taylor is suing Christie’s again over the cancelled sale of the heart-shaped diamond necklace.

New York--The dispute around the late Elizabeth Taylor’s “Taj Mahal” diamond necklace is back.
Taylor’s estate sued Christie’s in federal court in 2015 in a case that centered on the cancelled sale of the diamond. It was dismissed after both parties agreed to try to settle privately.
But on Thursday, co-trustees for the Sothern Trust, the late actress’s trust, filed another lawsuit in the Supreme Court in Manhattan against the New York-based auction house.
After Taylor’s death in 2011, her estate tasked Christie’s with selling some of her most prized possessions through auctions held in both New York and London.
According to the latest lawsuit, following the sales, Christie’s “failed to abide by its contractual obligations under the consignment agreement and blatantly disregarded its fiduciary duties to the trust.”
The auction house, the lawsuit claims, cancelled the sales of certain auction items without notifying or discussing it with the trust.
The primary dispute on which this new lawsuit is centered again is the sale of the “Taj Mahal,” a heart-shaped, table-cut diamond pendant that was the third highest-grossing lot of the auction.
(The diamond is inscribed with the name Nur Jahan, the wife of Mughal emperor Shah Jahangir. It is believed to eventually have been a gift from the ruler to his son, who became Emperor Shah Jahan and later built the Taj Mahal in memory of his late wife Mumtaz Mahal, hence the stone’s name.)
Taylor’s husband, actor Richard Burton, bought it from Cartier and gave the jewel to Taylor for her 40th birthday. At the record-setting auction of Taylor’s massive jewelry collection in 2011, Christie’s sold it to an anonymous buyer for $8.8 million.
Months after the auction ended, the buyer asked Christie’s to cancel the sale of the stone and give him back his money because he believed that the diamond did not actually belong to Emperor Shah Jahan.
But in its lawsuit, the trust claims that Christie’s never guaranteed the age of the diamond in its pre-auction materials, instead only saying it was an “Indian diamond,” a fact with which the buyer does not dispute.
The trust added in the suit that claims made outside of that vocabulary were done by Christie’s representatives during public appearances, which still does not warrant cancellation of the sale.
“Despite facing no credible threat of legal liability, Christie’s nonetheless rescinded the sale of the diamond. In doing so, Christie’s not only deviated from
After Christie’s cancelled the sale, it demanded the trust return the proceeds; the trust has declined to refund the money.
In a statement about the new lawsuit, Christie’s said: “Both parties believe the other owes them money as a result of the auction. We have been discussing this matter for some time. The trust apparently decided to cease discussions and instead pursued legal action without notice. Christie’s believes it is unfortunate that this issue cannot be resolved through mediation, especially given the success of the sale held for the trust’s benefit.”
The trust’s lawsuit goes on to list five other items that Christie’s was said to have sold at auction but has not given the estate money for, and also claims that Christie’s has withheld $2.9 million from the sale of a Bulgari ring in an attempt to “strong-arm” the trust into returning the Taj Mahal proceeds.
The trust is asking that the court find that it doesn’t have to return proceeds from the sale of the Taj Mahal diamond to Christie’s; an “accounting” of the cancelled sales; and either a return of the aforementioned five items or compensation for the full amount of their sales; and a $2.9 million payment for the Bulgari ring, among other things.
The Latest

Simon Wolf shares why the time was right to open a new office here, what he looks for in a retail partner, and why he loves U.S. consumers.

A third-generation jeweler, Ginsberg worked at his family’s store, Ginsberg Jewelers, from 1948 until his retirement in 2019.

The risk of laboratory-grown diamonds being falsely presented as natural diamonds presents a very significant danger to consumer trust.

The company failed to file its quarterly reports in a timely manner.


The organization also announced its board of directors.

Charms may be tiny but with their small size comes endless layering possibilities, from bracelets to necklaces and earrings.

Located in Valenza, the now 355,000-square-foot facility includes a new jewelry school that’s open to the public, Scuola Bulgari.

Paola Sasplugas, co-founder of the Barcelona-based jewelry brand, received the Fine Jewelry Award.

The basketball stars wear men’s jewelry from the “Curb Chain” collection.

The Signet Jewelers-owned retailer wants to encourage younger shoppers to wear fine jewelry every day, not just on special occasions.

Lilian Raji answers a question from a reader who is looking to grow her jewelry business but has a limited marketing budget.

GCAL by Sarine created the new role to sharpen the company’s focus on strategic partnerships and scalable expansion.

The Indiana jeweler has acquired Scottsdale Fine Jewelers in Scottsdale, Arizona.

“Cartier: Design, Craft, and Legacy” opened earlier this month at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.

Van Cott Jewelers in Vestal, New York, is hosting a going-out-of-business sale.

Industry veteran Samantha Larson has held leadership roles at Borsheims, McTeigue & McClelland, Stuller, and Long’s Jewelers.
The two organizations will hold the educational event together this fall in Mississippi.

The entrepreneur and “Shark Tank” star will share his top tips for success.

The Ukrainian brand’s new pendant is modeled after a traditional paska, a pastry often baked for Easter in Eastern European cultures.

The jeweler has announced a grand reopening for its recently remodeled location in Peoria, Illinois.

The “Strong Like Mom” campaign features moms who work at Tiffany & Co. and their children.

Interior designer Athena Calderone looked to decor from the 1920s and 1930s when crafting her first fine jewelry collection.

During a call about its full-year results, CEO Efraim Grinberg discussed how the company is approaching the uncertainty surrounding tariffs.

The free program provides educational content for jewelry salespeople and enthusiasts to learn or refresh their diamond knowledge.

The feedback will be used to prepare other jewelers for the challenges ahead, the organization said.