Majors

Analysis: Why Tiffany Won $15M from Costco

MajorsOct 12, 2016

Analysis: Why Tiffany Won $15M from Costco

Attorneys Emily Miao and Daniel Organ dissect the jury’s verdict in Tiffany’s trademark lawsuit against wholesale club Costco.

20161012_Tiffany-analysis.jpg
Emily Miao, Ph.D., is a partner at the law firm of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP in Chicago. She has more than 20 years’ experience in all aspects of intellectual property practice. MBHB associate Daniel L. Organ has experience preparing and prosecuting U.S. and foreign patents in a variety of technical fields.

In a highly publicized decision last year1,  federal Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the luxury retailer Tiffany & Co. (“Tiffany”), deciding that Costco Wholesale Corp. (“Costco”), the largest U.S. warehouse club chain, willfully infringed Tiffany’s trademark.

According to the court, Costco sold counterfeit diamond engagement rings bearing the Tiffany name and confused relevant consumers by using the word “Tiffany” in display case signage.  Judge Swain’s initial ruling against Costco allowed Tiffany to take Costco before a jury to seek damages, including profits from Costco’s sale of diamond rings, statutory damages, and punitive damages.

After several delays, the jury met in September for “Phase I” of the trial to decide (1) the amount of Costco’s profits and statutory damages under the Federal Lanham Act, and (2) whether Tiffany was entitled to punitive damages under New York General Business Law §349 and New York Common Law. “Phase II” was triggered when the jury found Costco liable for punitive damages. In their Phase I verdict, the Jury determined that Costco profited by $3.7 million from the infringing sales, and added an additional $1.8 million to fully compensate Tiffany, bringing the total award for profits to $5.5 million.2 The jury also awarded $2 million for statutory damages.3 The jury further held that Tiffany was entitled to punitive damages, and in the Phase II verdict awarded Tiffany another $8.25 million.4 

Analysis of Costco’s Profits
Tiffany sought an accounting of profits based on the sale of both “non-subject goods” (e.g., Costco memberships and goods other than diamond rings) and “subject goods” (e.g., diamond rings). Under Second Circuit law, in calculating “defendant’s profits,” a court should base its analysis on “infringing sales,” or sales that can be tied to the Lanham Act violation alleged.5 The court held that Tiffany presented no evidence tying the “non-subject goods” to Costco’s alleged infringement, and therefore removed the “non-subject goods” from the analysis. Regarding the “subject goods,” however, the court held that Costco did not act in good faith and therefore Tiffany was allowed to seek an accounting for profits from their sale.6 The court’s decision allowed the jury to decide, in the damages phase of the trial, how much Tiffany was entitled to for damages from Costco’s unlawful use of Tiffany’s mark.

During the damages trial, Tiffany argued that it was entitled to millions in damages from
profits realized by Costco, while Costco asserted the amount based on actual sales would be no more than $382,000.7 The jury disagreed with Costco, and awarded Tiffany $5.5 million based on Costco’s profits.

Analysis of Statutory Damages
In addition to awarding Tiffany Costco’s profits, the jury awarded Tiffany $2 million in statutory damages. The Federal Lanham Act states that when a counterfeit mark is used, up to $2 million may be awarded for a willful violation.8 In Judge Swain’s initial ruling, the court held that, as a matter of law, Costco used a counterfeit mark and that Tiffany satisfied the willfulness requirement.9 Then, to decide the exact amount of damages, the jury was instructed to consider factors such as Costco’s profits, Tiffany’s lost revenue, and the value of the mark.10 As a result, the jury determined that the maximum $2 million in statutory damages was justified.

Analysis of Punitive Damage
Tiffany sought punitive damages under both federal and state law. Under federal law, the court held that the Lanham Act prevents the collection of punitive damages.11  Under state law, however, the court noted that New York General Business Law §349 and New York Common Law allow punitive damages, albeit with an exceptionally high bar.12 Under these laws, “punitive damages are available where a defendant’s conduct has constituted gross, wanton or willful fraud or other morally culpable conduct to an extreme degree.”13 The court listed evidence in Tiffany’s favor, including emails from Costco jewelry buyers asking vendors to copy Tiffany designs and testimony that Costco employees were aware of customer confusion but did nothing to remedy it.14  

The jury ultimately agreed with Tiffany and in “Phase II” of the damages trial awarded Tiffany $8.25 million.

Conclusion
After the initial ruling, Judge Swain directed Tiffany and Costco to attempt to settle the outstanding issues. But since no settlement occurred, the damages phase proceeded and the jury handed Tiffany a sweeping victory, awarding nearly $16 million in damages.

Tiffany has been involved for many years in lawsuits regarding its intellectual property. A recent PACER search (PACER is a service for publically accessing court records electronically) returned 28 lawsuits since 1991 involving Tiffany copyrights, patents and trademarks. While the award of nearly $16 million against Costco is one of Tiffany’s largest, Tiffany previously won a default judgment of $26.5 million against numerous defendants for infringing on Tiffany trademarks and using infringing domain names.  

Costco is also no stranger to lawsuits regarding intellectual property issues, both as a plaintiff and (more often) as a defendant. A recent PACER search returned 190 lawsuits over intellectual property issues since 1991, comprising 47 trademark suits of which Costco was a defendant in 36; 119 patent suits of which Costco was a defendant in 102; and 24 copyright suits of which Costco was a defendant in 22.    

Tiffany has a history of policing its trademarks,15 in particular regarding goods such as its jewelry16,  blue gift boxes, cufflinks, and money clips17. But Tiffany has not policed its marks with respect to engagement rings--until now. The facts here were straight forward and favorable to Tiffany, so it is unsurprising that Tiffany won. Had Tiffany lost, there would have been inherent confusion around the use of the “TIFFANY” mark as applied to diamond rings and ring settings. Such a result would have been contrary to one of the purposes of trademark protection, which is to avoid consumer confusion.18  

With the conclusion of the damages trial, and assuming Judge Swain accepts the jury’s findings, Costco will likely file an appeal against Judge Swain’s ruling and the damages award. Stay tuned for further developments.

©2016 McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP. The information contained in this article reflects the understanding and opinions of the authors and is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to and does not represent legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by providing this information to you. The information in this article is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed in your particular state.


 1 Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 127 F. Supp. 3d 241 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2015).
 2 Jury Verdict Form at 1, Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 13CV1041 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2016), ECF No. 353.
 Id. at 2.
 4 Jury Verdict Form at 1, Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 13CV1041 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2016), ECF No. 357.
 5 Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 127 F. Supp. 3d at 259 (referencing Am. Honda Motor Co. v. Two Wheel Corp., 918 F.2d 1060, 1063-64 (2d Cir. 1990)).
 6 Id. at *261.
 7 Tiffany's Damages Case A Publicity Stunt, Costco Tells Jury, Law360 (Sept. 28, 2016), http://www.law360.com/articles/845762/tiffany-s-damages-case-a-publicity-stunt-costco-tells-jury.
 8 15 U.S.C.S. § 1117(c)(2).
 9 Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 127 F. Supp. 3d at 255.
10 Jury Instructions at 23-24, Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 13CV1041 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2016), ECF No. 345.
11 Tiffany and Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 127 F. Supp. 3d at 261.
12 Id.
13 Id., (citing Altadis U.S.A., Inc. v. Monte Cristi de Tabacos, c.x.a., No. 96CV4209-BSJ, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6892 (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 2001)).
14 Id. at 262.
15 For example, in 2006, Tiffany had an employee dedicate to monitoring listings on the eBay website for counterfeits and report any violations to eBay on a daily basis. See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 576 F. Supp. 2d 463, 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) aff'd in part, rev'd in part sub nom. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010) (holding that eBay did not infringe Tiffany’s marks). See also Complaint at ¶ 17 (describing other brand protection strategies).
16 See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. Luban, 282 F. Supp. 2d 123, 124 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (finding the operator of a website that sold counterfeit Tiffany jewelry liable for willful infringement).
17 See Tiffany (NJ), LLC v. 925LY.Com, 2:11-CV-00590-LDG, 2011 WL 2118634 (D. Nev. May 25, 2011) (issuing a preliminary injunction in favor of Tiffany).
18 See Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 774 (1992).
Michelle Graffis the editor-in-chief at National Jeweler, directing the publication’s coverage both online and in print.

The Latest

Boucheron Quatre Sand Collection
CollectionsOct 02, 2025
Boucheron Debuts Cuffs Crafted With 3D-Printed Sand

Its “Quantre Sand” capsule was made using a 3D sand printing technique borrowed from the automotive and aeronautics industries.

Stock image of crime scene tape
CrimeOct 02, 2025
$1M in Jewelry Stolen in Northern California Smash and Grab

Four individuals have been charged in the “takeover-style” robbery of Heller Jewelers last month, and additional charges are expected.

Just Jules opal necklace
TrendsOct 02, 2025
Amanda’s Style File: October’s Colorful Show

The month’s birthstones, tourmaline and opal, complement the palette of autumn.

gia-edu main image.png
Brought to you by
A Brilliant Future Is Here

Online education from GIA experts.

Peter Smith National Jeweler columnist
ColumnistsOct 01, 2025
Peter Smith: Why Vendor Success Starts With Self-Reflection

Smith shares the importance of looking at your company with openness and honesty to identify opportunities you may be missing.

Weekly QuizSep 25, 2025
This Week’s Quiz
Test your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
Take the Quiz
Plah Black Swan Earrings
EditorsOct 01, 2025
Playing Favorites: The Best Jewelry From Vicenzaoro

Associate Editor Natalie Francisco visited Italy to spot jewelry trends at the September Vicenzaoro show and share her top finds.

People shopping in a mall
SurveysOct 01, 2025
Consumer Confidence Hits 5-Month Low in September

Respondents were concerned about job availability and rising prices.

reDollar-fine-jewelry-department.jpg
Brought to you by
reDollar.com Is Rolling Out the Next Level Jewelry, Diamond & Watch Consignment Program

With their unmatched services and low fees, reDollar.com is challenging some big names in the online consignment world.

Gemfields rough emeralds
FinancialsOct 01, 2025
Gemfields’ H1 Revenue Falls 47%

Its latest interim financials revealed a challenging first half due in part to production troubles at its mines.

Gavel near stacks of books
CrimeSep 30, 2025
2 Suspects Charged in $300K Sleight-of-Hand Jewelry Store Scam

Two men allegedly used counterfeit bills to purchase luxury watches and jewelry from a North Carolina jeweler.

Billie Eilish and Finneas O’Connell John Hardy Lovestruck Collection
CollectionsSep 30, 2025
Billie Eilish, Finneas Partner with John Hardy

The “Lovestruck” collection, designed with the Academy and Grammy award-winning siblings, is the brand’s first lab-grown diamond offering.

Spinelli Kilcollin Market Highland Park
IndependentsSep 30, 2025
Spinelli Kilcollin Announces Residency in Dallas

The brand, celebrating its 15th anniversary, has popped up at Market, a luxury fashion destination in Highland Park Village.

Nina Pugliese Henne Jewelers
IndependentsSep 29, 2025
Nina Pugliese, Longtime Henne Jewelers Employee, Dies at 65

She was remembered as a creative and generous woman of faith, who also had a sweet tooth.

Kwait White and Yellow Gold Diamond Earrings
TrendsSep 29, 2025
Amanda’s Style File: Ear Focus

Move over neck mess, the ear story is the way to make a layering statement today.

Mark Henry Leandra Medine Cohen
IndependentsSep 29, 2025
Mark Henry Jewelry to Debut in Canada

The New York-based brand is set to launch a limited-time offering for the holiday season at Holt Renfrew in Toronto.

Overnight volume 7 bridal catalog
MajorsSep 29, 2025
Overnight Releases New Bridal Catalog

The “Volume 7” bridal catalog features best-selling engagement rings, trending styles, and a new section highlighting anniversary bands.

Hand holding holiday shopping bags
SurveysSep 26, 2025
Online Shopping, Influencers to Drive Holiday Spending, Mastercard Says

Holiday sales growth is expected to slow as consumers grapple with inflation and tariff-related uncertainty.

Austin Shines Jewelry Award
Events & AwardsSep 26, 2025
Winners of Austin Jewelry Design Contest Announced

Jamie Turner Designs is among the winners of the local “Austin Shines” contest, hosted by Eliza Page, a jewelry store in Austin, Texas.

Kwit Square Signet Pinky Ring in Red and Azure
TrendsSep 26, 2025
Piece of the Week: Kwit Jewelry’s Square Signet Pinky Ring

The red and azure colorway is one of many fun enamel pairings offered, bringing whimsy to the classic style of a monogramed signet ring.

Jewelers of America Fly In
Policies & IssuesSep 25, 2025
JA CEO Provides Tariff Update Following Annual Fly-In

A trade deal with Switzerland seems probable, but reaching an agreement with India remains a challenge, David Bonaparte said.

Entrance to Jwaneng diamond mine in Botswana
SourcingSep 25, 2025
2 African Countries Aim to Take Stake in De Beers

Botswana’s president said his country wants a controlling share, while Angola envisions multiple countries holding minority stakes.

Kira Jewels Growing Rowing Machines
Lab-GrownSep 25, 2025
Kira Jewels Expands Lab-Grown Diamond Production

The manufacturer is adding 1,400 chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactors to its growing facility in India.

Alex Moss SoHo store
IndependentsSep 25, 2025
Alex Moss’ New Flagship Brings Bold Jewels to SoHo

The jeweler to the stars has worked with Drake, A$AP Rocky, Tyler the Creator, and other celebrities.

Matthew Wilson, Kavin Kulamavalava, and a Elmasolvex VA
WatchesSep 25, 2025
Wilson & Son Jewelers Donates to the Horological Society of New York

The Scarsdale, New York-based jeweler donated a professional-grade watch cleaning machine.

Representatives of India’s Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council and Indian government leaders
Policies & IssuesSep 24, 2025
Tariffs Throw Diamond Trade Into Disarray

The 50 percent tariffs on diamonds shipped from India to the U.S. have pushed midstream manufacturers to the edge.

Father’s Day diamond advertisement that ran in India
SourcingSep 24, 2025
De Beers Adopts New Strategies to Drive Natural Diamond Demand in India

De Beers’ refreshed, multipronged approach, which includes generic promotions and retail partnerships, is delivering positive dividends.

Policies & IssuesSep 24, 2025
For Jewelry Manufacturers, Higher Tariffs Create Long-Term Worries

They are trying to balance the need to sustain well-established relationships with the pressure higher tariffs have put on margins.

×

This site uses cookies to give you the best online experience. By continuing to use & browse this site, we assume you agree to our Privacy Policy